An Open Access edition of this book is available on the Liverpool University Press website and the OAPEN library.
Improvising Reconciliation is prompted by South Africa’s enduring state of injustice. It is both a lament for the promise, since lost, with which non-racial democracy was inaugurated and, more substantially, a space within which to consider its possible renewal. As such, this study lobbies for an expanded approach to the country’s formal transition from apartheid in order to grapple with reconciliation’s ongoing potential within the contemporary imaginary. It does not, however, presume to correct the contradictions that have done so much to corrupt the concept in recent decades. Instead, it upholds the language of reconciliation for strategic, rather than essential, reasons. And while this study surveys some of the many serious critiques levelled at the country’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (1996-2001), these misgivings help situate the plural, improvised approach to reconciliation that has arguably emerged from the margins of the cultural sphere in the years since. Improvisation serves here as a separate way of both thinking and doing reconciliation. It recalibrates the concept according to a series of deliberative, agonistic and iterative, rather than monumental, interventions, rendering reconciliation in terms that make failure a necessary condition for its future realisation.
'Improvising Reconciliation revisits the concept of reconciliation, popularised globally through the work of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, to reimagine its potential for racial justice. Lucid, critical and generous, the book presents reconciliation as an unstable and contingent ‘problem space’ in which risks and improvisations in reconciliation’s name may yet afford opportunities to reimagine and rework justice. By exploring performances inspired by the truth commission, Charlton develops a powerful argument that the concept retains political and ethical charge and has the capaciousness to produce futures otherwise.'
Professor Fiona Ross, University of Cape Town.