London governance and the politics of neighbourhood planning: a case for investigation

Pycock, Graham

Town Planning Review (2020), 91, (1), 1–20.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.1
Language: English
Pages: 20

Abstract

The Localism Act 2011 has successfully devolved planning powers to over 2,500 English communities, involving 14 million people, with over 700 ‘made’ neighbourhood plans legitimised by referendum. In London, however, there are less than one-tenth of the made plans than in the rest of England. Institutional resistance and policy choices may be implicated. Two national studies of neighbourhood planning are reviewed. The role of the local authority is found to be a crucial factor in determining progress, and issues of social deprivation and unequal access are highlighted. Theorisation is considered by reference to a range of academic studies of localism and neighbourhood planning. Distinctions made between ‘representative’ and ‘community’ localism, and objections to anti-political effects, are noted. There has been remarkably little research into borough governance and neighbourhood planning in the capital. Based upon evidence of anomalous and differentiated governance practice, a study in London is called for.

FormatArticle

£25.00

READ THIS ARTICLE

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

APOSTOLIDES, K. (2018), ‘Neighbourhood planning in London: fulfilling the coalition’s stated objectives? An exploration of the representativeness and inclusiveness of neighbourhood forums’, Town Planning Review, 89, 229–57. Google Scholar

BAILEY, N. and PILL, M. (2015), ‘Can the state empower communities through localism? An evaluation of recent approaches to neighbourhood governance in England’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 927–42. Google Scholar

BRADLEY, Q. (2017), ‘Neighbourhoods, communities and the local scale’, in S. Brownill and Q. Bradley (eds), Localism and Neighbourhood Planning, Bristol, Policy Press, 39–55. Google Scholar

BURTON, T. (2015), ‘Neighbourhood planning: the next five years’ (unpublished position paper supplied to the author, 18 February 2016), August 2015. Google Scholar

CLARKE, N. and COCHRANE, A. (2013), ‘Geographies and politics of localism: the localism of the United Kingdom’s coalition government’, Political Geography, 34, 10–23. Google Scholar

DAVOUDI, S. and MADANIPOUR, A. (2015), ‘Localism and the “post-social” governmentality’, in S. Davoudi and A. Madanipour (eds), Reconsidering Localism, Abingdon, Routledge, 77–102. Google Scholar

EVANS, M., MARSH, D. and STOKER, G. (2013), ‘Understanding localism’, Policy Studies, 34, 401–7. Google Scholar

FUTURE OF LONDON (2017), Making the Case for Place, https://www.futureoflondon.org.uk/2017/11/30/making-case-place-report-launch/ (accessed 24 November 2017). Google Scholar

HILDRETH, P. (2011), ‘What is localism, and what implications do different models have for managing the local economy?’, Local Economy, 26, 702–14. Google Scholar

HM GOVERNMENT (2010), The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, London, Cabinet Office. Google Scholar

LAFFIN, M. (2014), ‘Public services in a “postdemocratic age”: an alternative framework to network governance’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 762–76. Google Scholar

LEACH, S., STEWART, J. and JONES, G. (2018), Centralism, Devolution and the Future of Local Government in England, London, Routledge. Google Scholar

LOCALITY (2018), People Power: Findings of the Commission on the Future of Localism, London, Locality. Google Scholar

LONDON BOROUGH OF LAMBETH (2016), Visioning West Norwood and Tulse Hill, https://moderngov.lambeth.gov.uk/documents/s78734/ODDR%20Visioning%20West%20Norwood%20Tulse%20Hill%2010.12.15.docx.pdf (accessed 12 March 2017). Google Scholar

LOWNDES, V. and GARDNER, A. (2016), ‘Local governance under the Conservatives: super-austerity, devolution and the “smarter state”’, Local Government Studies, 42, 357–75. Google Scholar

LUDWIG, C. and LUDWIG, G. (2014), ‘Empty gestures? A review of discourses of “localism” from the practitioner’s perspective’, Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 29, 245–56. Google Scholar

MILLIBAND, D. (2006), ‘More power to the people, urges Miliband’, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2006/feb/21/localgovernment.politics (accessed 4 January 2018). Google Scholar

MINISTRY OF HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (2018), Notes on Neighbourhood Planning November 2018, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/762518/180723__Notes_on_Neighbourhood_Planning_Nov_2018.pdf (accessed 16 December 2018). Google Scholar

NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNERS LONDON (2017), London’s Local Plans: Are They Supporting Neighbourhood Planning?, http://media.wix.com/ugd/95f6a3_6d2d4b5b624c44fd963fedcea470d28d.pdf (accessed 12 March 2017). Google Scholar

NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNERS LONDON (2018a), ‘London’s neighbourhood planning MAP & LIST’, http://www.neighbourhoodplanners.london/map (accessed 12 March 2018). Google Scholar

NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNERS LONDON (2018b), Why So Little Support for Neighbourhood Planning?, http://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/95f6a3_b4847248644345c1be4c63b9419f1bd4.pdf (accessed 22 February 2018). Google Scholar

OFFICE FOR NATIONAL STATISTICS (2018), Subnational Population Projections for England: 2016-Based, https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationprojections/bulletins/subnationalpopulationprojectionsforengland/2016based (accessed 12 January 2019). Google Scholar

PAINTER, J., ORTON, A., MACLEOD, G., DOMINELLI, L. and PANDE, R. (2011), Connecting Localism and Community Empowerment, Durham, University of Durham. Google Scholar

PARKER, G., LYNN, T. and WARGENT, M. (2014), User Experience of Neighbourhood Planning in England Research, London, Locality. Google Scholar

PARKER, G., LYNN, T. and WARGENT, M. (2015), ‘Sticking to the script? The co-production of neighbourhood planning in England’, Town Planning Review, 86, 519–36. Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and SALTER, K. (2016), ‘Five years of neighbourhood planning: a review of take-up and distribution’, Town and Country Planning, 85, 181–88. Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and SALTER, K. (2017), ‘Taking stock of neighbourhood planning in England 2011–2016’, Planning Practice & Research, 32, 478–90. Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and WARGENT, M. (2017), Neighbourhood Planning Users’ Research Revisited, School of Real Estate and Planning, University of Reading, http://www.reading.ac.uk/web/files/uor-npur-exec-jan17.pdf (accessed 2 January 2018). Google Scholar

PARLIAMENT, HOUSE OF COMMONS, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SELECT COMMITTEE (2017), Effectiveness of Local Authority Overview and Scrutiny Committees, London, HMSO, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcomloc/369/369.pdf (accessed 4 January 2018). Google Scholar

PIPE, J. (2013), ‘Two years on what has the Localism Act achieved?’, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/local-government-network/2013/nov/02/localism-act-devolution-uk-local-authorities (accessed 2 February 2018). Google Scholar

RHODES, R. (2007), ‘Understanding government ten years on’, Organisation Studies, 28, 1243–64. Google Scholar

RICHARDSON, L. and DUROSE, C. (2013), Who Is Accountable in Localism? Findings from Theory and Practice, Manchester, University of Manchester Press. Google Scholar

SALTER, K. (2018), ‘Caught in the middle? The response of local planning authorities to neighbourhood planning in England’, Town and Country Planning, 87, 344–49. Google Scholar

SORENSEN, E. and TORFING, J. (2009), ‘Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance’, Public Administration, 87, 243–60. Google Scholar

STOKER, G. (2006), Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar

STUDDERT, J. (2013), One Nation Localism: How Labour Councils Are Delivering Fairness in Tough Times, LGA Labour group, https://www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/executive-summary-one-nat-13a.pdf (accessed 4 January 2018). Google Scholar

STURZAKER, J., SANTAMARIA, F. and TAYLOR, E. (2019), ‘Policy and practice. Localism: a planning panacea?’, Town Planning Review, 90, 481–96, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ab7f/f4b4ef3f506b09ed177b45a087a572d293c6.pdf (accessed 26 September 2019). Google Scholar

STURZAKER, J. and SHAW, D. (2015), ‘Localism in practice: lessons from a pioneer neighbourhood plan in England’, Town Planning Review, 86, 587–609. Google Scholar

TRAVERS, A. (2018), ‘London: government and politics in the boroughs’, in P. Dunleavy, A. Park and R. Taylor (eds), The UK’s Changing Democracy: The 2018 Democratic Audit, London, LSE Press, 340–50. Google Scholar

WALKER, A., GLOVER, J. and KOEHLER, I. (2013), Reviving Localism: Three Challenges, London, Local Government Information Unit. Google Scholar

WARGENT, M. and PARKER, G. (2018), ‘Re-imagining neighbourhood governance: the future of neighbourhood planning in England’, Town Planning Review, 89, 379–402. Google Scholar

WESTMINSTER (2017), Statista, University of Westminster, https://www.statista.com/statistics/294681/population-england-united-kingdom-uk-regional (accessed 7 March 2018). Google Scholar

WILLIAMS, A., GOODWIN, M. and CLOKE, P. (2014), ‘Neoliberalism, big society and progressive localism’, Environment and Planning A, 46, 2798–815. Google Scholar

WILLS, J. (2012), ‘The geography of community and political organisation in London today’, Political Geography, 31, 114–26, www.elsevier.com/locate/polgeo (accessed 12 February 2017). Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Pycock, Graham

Town Planning Review