Town Planning Review

Planners as market actors: the role of local planning authorities in the UK’s urban regeneration practice

Town Planning Review (2015), 86, (6), 625–650.

Abstract

At a time of public sector retrenchment in urban regeneration it has become increasingly important to understand how planners can help create better places. Recent studies suggest that planners must behave as market actors by strategically deploying planning tools to influence market behaviour. In this context, this paper examines how local planning authorities use a variety of policy instruments to influence urban projects and turn planning strategies into action. To understand how planning tools can be used to achieve successful results in urban regeneration practice, the paper presents a cross-comparison of mixed-use city centre regeneration projects in Bristol and Liverpool.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

ADAMS, D. and TIESDELL, S. (2010), ‘Planners as market actors: rethinking state-market relations in land and property’, Planning Theory & Practice, 11, 187–207. Planners as market actors: rethinking state-market relations in land and property Planning Theory & Practice 11 187 207 Google Scholar

ADAMS, D. and TIESDELL, S. (2013), Shaping Places: Urban Planning, Design and Development, London, Routledge. Shaping Places: Urban Planning, Design and Development Google Scholar

ADAMS. D., CROUDACE, R. and TIESDELL, S. (2012), ‘Exploring the “notional property developer” as a policy construct’, Urban Studies, 49, 2577–96. Exploring the “notional property developer” as a policy construct Urban Studies 49 2577 96 Google Scholar

ADAMS, D., WATKINS, C. and WHITE, M. (2005), Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets, Oxford, Blackwell. Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets Google Scholar

ALEXANDER, A. (2009), Britain’s New Towns: Garden Cities to Sustainable Communities, Abingdon, Routledge. Britain’s New Towns: Garden Cities to Sustainable Communities Google Scholar

ALEXANDER, E. R. (2001), ‘Why planning vs. markets is an oxymoron: asking the right question’, Planning and Markets, 4, http://www-pam.usc.edu/volume4/v4i1a2s1.html (accessed June 2014). Google Scholar

ALLMENDIGER, P. and HAUGHTON, G. (2007), ‘The fluid scales and scope of UK spatial planning’, Environment and Planning A, 39, 1478–96. The fluid scales and scope of UK spatial planning Environment and Planning A 39 1478 96 Google Scholar

ANDERSSON, D. E. and MORONI, S. (eds) (2014), Cities and Private Planning: Property Rights, Entrepreneurship and Transaction Costs, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. Cities and Private Planning: Property Rights, Entrepreneurship and Transaction Costs Google Scholar

ASKEW, J. (1996), ‘Case Study: Canons Marsh’, in J. Allinson, J. Askew, J. Claydon, L. Davies, J. Tempest and R. Tetlow (eds), Implementing Town Planning: The Role of Town Planning in the Development Process, Essex, Longman Group, 181–91. Case Study: Canons Marsh Implementing Town Planning: The Role of Town Planning in the Development Process 181 91 Google Scholar

BARRETT, S. and FUDGE, C. (1981), ‘Examining the policy–action relationship’, in S. Barrett and C. Fudge (eds), Policy and Action, London, Methuen, 3–38. Examining the policy–action relationship Policy and Action 3 38 Google Scholar

BASSETT, K. (1996), ‘Partnerships, business élites and urban politics: new forms of governance in an English city?’, Urban Studies, 33, 539–55. Partnerships, business élites and urban politics: new forms of governance in an English city? Urban Studies 33 539 55 Google Scholar

BASSETT, K. (1999), ‘Growth coalitions in Britain’s waning Sunbelt’, in A. Jonas and D. Wilson (eds), The Urban Growth Machine, Albany, NY, State University of New York Press, 177–94. Growth coalitions in Britain’s waning Sunbelt The Urban Growth Machine 177 94 Google Scholar

BASSETT, K., GRIFFITHS, R. and SMITH, I. (2002), ‘Testing governance: partnerships, planning and conflict in waterfront regeneration’, Urban Studies, 39, 1757–75. Testing governance: partnerships, planning and conflict in waterfront regeneration Urban Studies 39 1757 75 Google Scholar

BIDDULPH, M. (2011), ‘Urban design, regeneration and the entrepreneurial city’, Progress in Planning, 76, 63–103. Urban design, regeneration and the entrepreneurial city Progress in Planning 76 63 103 Google Scholar

BRENNER, N. and THEODORE, N. (2002), Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Malden, MA, Blackwell. Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe Google Scholar

BUITELAAR, E. (2007), The Cost of Land Use Decisions: Applying Transaction Cost Economics to Planning and Development, Oxford, Blackwell. The Cost of Land Use Decisions: Applying Transaction Cost Economics to Planning and Development Google Scholar

CLEMENT, M. (2010), ‘Local notables and the city council revisited: the use of partnerships in the regeneration of Bristol’, Social and Public Policy Review, 4, 34–49. Local notables and the city council revisited: the use of partnerships in the regeneration of Bristol Social and Public Policy Review 4 34 49 Google Scholar

COUCH, C., FOWLES, S. and KARECHA, J. (2009), ‘Reurbanization and housing markets in the central and inner areas of Liverpool, Planning Practice and Research, 24, 321–34. Reurbanization and housing markets in the central and inner areas of Liverpool Planning Practice and Research 24 321 34 Google Scholar

DAAMEN, T. A. (2010), Strategy as Force: Towards Effective Strategies for Urban Development Projects: The Case of Rotterdam City Ports, Amsterdam, IOS Press. Strategy as Force: Towards Effective Strategies for Urban Development Projects: The Case of Rotterdam City Ports Google Scholar

DE MAGALHÃES, C. (2001), ‘International property consultants and the transformation of local property markets’, Journal of Property Research, 18, 99–121. International property consultants and the transformation of local property markets Journal of Property Research 18 99 121 Google Scholar

DIGAETANO, A. and KLEMANSKI, J. (1993), ‘Urban regimes in comparative perspective: the politics of urban development in Britain’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 29, 55–83. Urban regimes in comparative perspective: the politics of urban development in Britain Urban Affairs Quarterly 29 55 83 Google Scholar

DIGAETANO, A. and KLEMANSKI, J. (1999), Power and City Governance: Comparative Perspectives on Urban Development, Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press. Power and City Governance: Comparative Perspectives on Urban Development Google Scholar

ELMORE, R. F. (1987), ‘Instruments and strategy in public policy’, Policy Studies Review, 7, 174–86. Instruments and strategy in public policy Policy Studies Review 7 174 86 Google Scholar

FAINSTEIN, S. S. (2010), The Just City, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press. The Just City Google Scholar

GIDDENS, A. (2000), The Third Way and its Critics, Cambridge, Polity Press. The Third Way and its Critics Google Scholar

GREED, C. (1996), ‘The Bristol and Avon context’, in J. Allinson, J. Askew, J. Claydon, L. Davies, J. Tempest, and R. Tetlow (eds), Implementing Town Planning: The Role of Town Planning in the Development Process, Essex, Longman Group, 124–38. The Bristol and Avon context Implementing Town Planning: The Role of Town Planning in the Development Process 124 38 Google Scholar

HACKWORTH, J. (2007), The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology and Development in American Urbanism, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press. The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology and Development in American Urbanism Google Scholar

HALL, P. and WARD, C. (1998), Sociable Cities: The Legacy of Ebenezer Howard, Chichester, John Wiley and Sons. Sociable Cities: The Legacy of Ebenezer Howard Google Scholar

HARVEY, D. (2012), Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, London, Verso. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution Google Scholar

HEURKENS, E. (2010), ‘Private sector-led urban development projects’, Real Estate Research Quarterly, 2, 29–34. Private sector-led urban development projects Real Estate Research Quarterly 2 29 34 Google Scholar

HEURKENS, E. (2012), Private sector-led urban development projects: management, partnerships & effects in the Netherlands and the UK, Architecture and the Built Environment, 4, Delft, Delft University of Technology. Private sector-led urban development projects: management, partnerships & effects in the Netherlands and the UK Architecture and the Built Environment 4 Google Scholar

HEURKENS, E. (2013), ‘Een nieuwe rolverdeling: privaat ‘in the lead’, publiek faciliteert’, VHV Bulletin, July, 14–15. Een nieuwe rolverdeling: privaat ‘in the lead VHV Bulletin Google Scholar

HEURKENS, E. and HOBMA, F. (2014), ‘Private sector-led urban development projects: comparative insights from planning practices in the Netherlands and the UK’, Planning Practice and Research, 29, 350–69. Private sector-led urban development projects: comparative insights from planning practices in the Netherlands and the UK Planning Practice and Research 29 350 69 Google Scholar

HEYWOOD, A. (2000), Key Concepts in Politics, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. Key Concepts in Politics Google Scholar

HILTON, C. (2007), ‘Making it happen in Liverpool’, Urban Design, 103, Summer, 27–29. Making it happen in Liverpool Urban Design 103 27 29 Google Scholar

LARNER, W. (2000), ‘Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality’, Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5–25. Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality Studies in Political Economy 63 5 25 Google Scholar

LIND, H. (2002), ‘Market-oriented land-use planning: a conceptual note’, Planning & Markets, 5, http://www-pam.usc.edu/volume5/v5i1a5s1.html (accessed October 2014). Google Scholar

LITTLEFIELD, D. (2009), Liverpool One: Remaking a City Centre, Chichester, Wiley. Liverpool One: Remaking a City Centre Google Scholar

LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL AND GROSVENOR (2009), BCSC Town Centre Environment Award – Liverpool One: The Remaking of a City Centre, Liverpool, Liverpool City Council and Grosvenor. Google Scholar

MILES, M. B. and HUBERMANN, A. M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, Sage. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook Google Scholar

MUÑOZ GIELEN, D. (2010), Capturing Value Increase in Urban Redevelopment: A Study of How the Economic Values Increase in Urban Redevelopment can be used to Finance the Necessary Public Infrastructure and Other Facilities, Leiden, Sidestone Press. Capturing Value Increase in Urban Redevelopment: A Study of How the Economic Values Increase in Urban Redevelopment can be used to Finance the Necessary Public Infrastructure and Other Facilities Google Scholar

OPPE NEWS (2009), Bristol’s Harbourside Development Achieves Design Gold, http://www.offplanpropertyexchange.com/news/2009/07/08/bristols-harbourside-development%20-achieves-design-gold/1499 (accessed June 2014). Google Scholar

PARKER, C. and GARNELL, C. (2006), ‘Regeneration and retail in Liverpool: a new approach’, Journal of Retail and Leisure Property, 5, 292–304. Regeneration and retail in Liverpool: a new approach Journal of Retail and Leisure Property 5 292 304 Google Scholar

PEEL, D. and LLOYD, G. (2008), ‘Redeveloping paradise? Scale does matter’, Town and Country Planning, 77, 379–80. Redeveloping paradise? Scale does matter Town and Country Planning 77 379 80 Google Scholar

PENNINGTON, M. (2000), Planning and the Political Market: Public Choice and the Politics of Government Failure, London, Athlone. Planning and the Political Market: Public Choice and the Politics of Government Failure Google Scholar

PUNTER, J. V. (1992), ‘Design control and the regeneration of docklands: the example of Bristol’, Journal of Property Research, 9, 49–78. Design control and the regeneration of docklands: the example of Bristol Journal of Property Research 9 49 78 Google Scholar

PURCELL, M. (2008), Recapturing Democracy: Neoliberalization and the Struggle for Alternative Urban Futures, New York, NY, Routledge. Recapturing Democracy: Neoliberalization and the Struggle for Alternative Urban Futures Google Scholar

ROSEMANN, J., QU, L. and SEPÚLVEDA, D. (eds) (2009), The NEW Urban Question: Urbanism Beyond Neo-Liberalism, Rotterdam, International Forum on Urbanism. The NEW Urban Question: Urbanism Beyond Neo-Liberalism Google Scholar

RYDIN, Y. (2010), Governing for Sustainable Urban Development, London, Earthscan. Governing for Sustainable Urban Development Google Scholar

SMITH, S. J., MUNRO, M. and CHRISTIE, H. (2006), ‘Performing (housing) markets’, Urban Studies, 43, 81–98. Performing (housing) markets Urban Studies 43 81 98 Google Scholar

STALEY, S. R. and SCARLETT, L. (1998), ‘Market-oriented planning: principles and tools for the 21st century’, Planning and Markets, 1, http://www-pam.usc.edu/volume1/v1i1a5s1.html (accessed October 2014). Google Scholar

SQUIRES, G. and HEURKENS, E. (eds) (2015), International Approaches to Real Estate Development, London, Routledge. International Approaches to Real Estate Development Google Scholar

STEWART, M. (1996), ‘Too little, too late: the politics of local complacency’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, 119–37. Too little, too late: the politics of local complacency Urban Affairs Quarterly 18 119 37 Google Scholar

TALLON, A. R. (2006), ‘Regenerating Bristol’s Harbourside’, Town and Country Planning, 75, 278–82. Regenerating Bristol’s Harbourside Town and Country Planning 75 278 82 Google Scholar

TALLON, A. R. (2013), Urban Regeneration in the UK, London, Routledge. Urban Regeneration in the UK Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details