ALTERMAN, R. (2012), ‘Land-use regulations and property values: the “windfalls capture” idea revisited’, in N. Brooks, K. Donanghy and G. J. Knaap (eds), The Oxford Handbook on Urban Economics and Planning, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Land-use regulations and property values: the “windfalls capture” idea revisited The Oxford Handbook on Urban Economics and Planning Google Scholar

BERDING,U.,HAVEMANN,A.,PEGELS,J.andPERETHALER,B.(2010), Stadträume in Spannungsfeldern: Plätze, Parks und Promenaden im Schnittbereich öffentlichter und privater Aktivitäten, Detmold, Rohn Verlag. Stadträume in Spannungsfeldern: Plätze, Parks und Promenaden im Schnittbereich öffentlichter und privater Aktivitäten Google Scholar

BERENSCHOT (2012), Evaluatie Experimentenwet Bedrijven Investeringszones, Utrecht, Berendschot. Google Scholar

BRANDSEN, T. and PESTOFF, V. (2006), ‘Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: an introduction’, Public Management Review, 8, 493–501. Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: an introduction Public Management Review 8 493 501 Google Scholar

BRINKHORST, T. (2009), ‘High Line en Hofpleinlijn sporen aan tot gebiedsontwikkeling’, Building Business, 1, 52–55. High Line en Hofpleinlijn sporen aan tot gebiedsontwikkeling Building Business 1 52 55 Google Scholar

BUITELAAR, E. (2010), ‘Cracks in the myth: challenges to land policy in the Netherlands’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101, 349–56. Cracks in the myth: challenges to land policy in the Netherlands Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 101 349 56 Google Scholar

BUITELAAR, E. and NEEDHAM, D. B. (2007), ‘Property rights and private initiatives: an introduction’, Town Planning Review, 78, 1–8. Property rights and private initiatives: an introduction Town Planning Review 78 1 8 Google Scholar

BUITELAAR, E., GALLE, M. and SOREL, N. (2014), ‘The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands’, in D. E. Andersson and S. Moroni (eds), Cities and Private Planning: Property Rights, Entrepreneurship and Transaction Costs, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing. The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands Cities and Private Planning: Property Rights, Entrepreneurship and Transaction Costs Google Scholar

CARMONA, M. (2014), ‘Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative’, Journal of Urbanism, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909518 (accessed 10 June 2015). Google Scholar

CHIODELLI, F. and MORONI, S. (2015), ‘Do malls contribute to the privatisation of public space and the erosion of the public sphere? Reconsidering the role of shopping centres’, City, Culture and Society, 1, 3–14. Do malls contribute to the privatisation of public space and the erosion of the public sphere? Reconsidering the role of shopping centres City, Culture and Society 1 3 14 Google Scholar

COASE, R. H. (1960), ‘The problem of social costs’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. The problem of social costs Journal of Law and Economics 3 1 44 Google Scholar

COOK, I. (2008), ‘Mobilising urban policies: the policy transfer of US Business Improvement Districts to England and Wales’, Urban Studies, 45, 773–95. Mobilising urban policies: the policy transfer of US Business Improvement Districts to England and Wales Urban Studies 45 773 95 Google Scholar

DE MAGALHÃES, C. and CARMONA, M. (2006), ‘Innovations in the management of public space: reshaping and refocusing governance’, Planning Theory and Practice, 7, 289–303. Innovations in the management of public space: reshaping and refocusing governance Planning Theory and Practice 7 289 303 Google Scholar

DE VRIES S., VERHEIJ, R. H., GROENEWEGEN, P. P. and SPREEUWENBERG, P. (2003), ‘Natural environments – healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between green space and health’, Environment and Planning A, 35, 1717–31. Natural environments – healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between green space and health Environment and Planning A 35 1717 31 Google Scholar

FALUDI, A. and VAN DER VALK, A. (1994), Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century Google Scholar

FHL (FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE) (2008), Designing the High Line: Gansevoort Street to 30th Street, New York, Friends of the High Line. Google Scholar

GUNN, S. and VIGAR, G. (2012), ‘Reform processes and discretionary acting space in English planning practice, 1997–2010’, Town Planning Review, 83, 533–52. Reform processes and discretionary acting space in English planning practice, 1997–2010 Town Planning Review 83 533 52 Google Scholar

HATUKA, T. and TOCH, E. (2014), ‘The emergence of portable private-personal territory: smartphones, social conduct and public spaces’, Urban Studies, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098014524608 (accessed 10 June 2015). Google Scholar

HEALEY, P. (1997), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, London, Macmillan. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies Google Scholar

JACOBS, H. M. (2008), ‘The future of the regulatory takings issue in the U.S. and Europe: divergence and convergence?’ Urban Lawyer, 40, 51–72. The future of the regulatory takings issue in the U.S. and Europe: divergence and convergence? Urban Lawyer 40 51 72 Google Scholar

JACOBS, H. M. (2009), ‘An alternative perspective on U.S. – European property rights and land use planning: differences without any substance’, Planning and Environmental Law, 61, 3–12. An alternative perspective on U.S. – European property rights and land use planning: differences without any substance Planning and Environmental Law 61 3 12 Google Scholar

JACOBS, H. M. (2012), ‘Talking about property rights over tea: discourse and policy in the U.S. and Europe’, in T. Hartmann and B. Needham (eds), Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered, Surrey/Burrington, Ashgate. Talking about property rights over tea: discourse and policy in the U.S. and Europe Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered Google Scholar

JACOBS, H. M. and VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (2014), ‘Is regulatory takings coming to the Netherlands?’ (paper presented at 2014 AESOP Conference, Utrecht, 9–12 July 2014). Is regulatory takings coming to the Netherlands? Google Scholar

KAYDEN, J. S. (2000), Privately Owned Public Space: The New York City Experience, New York, Wiley. Privately Owned Public Space: The New York City Experience Google Scholar

KLEMME, M., PEGELS, J. and SCHLACK-FUHRMANN, E. (2013), ‘Co-production: review of analogous co-production of urban space in German cities, New York and Santiago de Chile’, PND online, 8, 1–11, http://www.planung-neu-denken.de/content/view/255/41 (accessed 10 June 2015). Google Scholar

KOHN, M. (2004), Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space, New York, Routledge. Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space Google Scholar

LANGSTRAAT, F. and VAN MELIK, R. (2013), ‘Challenging the “end of public space”: a comparative analysis of publicness in British and Dutch urban spaces’, Journal of Urban Design, 18, 429–48. Challenging the “end of public space”: a comparative analysis of publicness in British and Dutch urban spaces Journal of Urban Design 18 429 48 Google Scholar

LENGKEEK, A. (ed.) (2007), Stedelijkheid als rendement. Privaat initiatief voor publieke ruimte, Rotterdam, Trancity. Stedelijkheid als rendement. Privaat initiatief voor publieke ruimte Google Scholar

LOFLAND, L. H. (1998), The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory, New York, Aldine de Gruyter. The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory Google Scholar

LOUGHRAN, K. (2014), ‘Parks for profit: The High Line, growth machines, and the uneven development of urban public spaces’, City and Community, 13, 49–68. Parks for profit: The High Line, growth machines, and the uneven development of urban public spaces City and Community 13 49 68 Google Scholar

LOUKAITOU-SIDERIS, A. and BANERJEE, T. (1998), Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form, Berkeley, University of California Press. Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form Google Scholar

MADANIPOUR, A. (2003), Public and Private Spaces of the City, London, Routledge. Public and Private Spaces of the City Google Scholar

MADANIPOUR, A., KNIERBEIN, S. and DEGROS, A. (2014), Public Space and the Challenges of Urban Transformation in Europe, New York, Routledge. Public Space and the Challenges of Urban Transformation in Europe Google Scholar

MITCHELL, D. (1995), ‘The end of public space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85, 108–33. The end of public space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85 108 33 Google Scholar

NEEDHAM, B. (2006), Planning, Law and Economics: The Rules We Make For Using Land, London, Routledge. Planning, Law and Economics: The Rules We Make For Using Land Google Scholar

NEEDHAM, B. (2007), ‘Belangen, rechten en plichten bij publieke ruimte’, in A. Lengkeek (ed.), Stedelijkheid als rendement: Privaat initiatief voor publieke ruimte, Rotterdam, Trancity. Belangen, rechten en plichten bij publieke ruimte Stedelijkheid als rendement: Privaat initiatief voor publieke ruimte Google Scholar

NEEDHAM, B. (2014), Dutch Land Use Planning: The Principles and the Practice, Farnham, Ashgate. Dutch Land Use Planning: The Principles and the Practice Google Scholar

NEMETH, J. (2009), ‘Defining a public: the management of privately owned public space’, Urban Studies, 46, 2463–90. Defining a public: the management of privately owned public space Urban Studies 46 2463 90 Google Scholar

ORUM, A. M. and NEAL, Z. P. (2010), Common Ground? Readings and Reflections on Public Space, New York, Routledge. Common Ground? Readings and Reflections on Public Space Google Scholar

OSTROM, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Google Scholar

PBL (PLANBUREAU VOOR DE LEEFOMGEVING) and URHAHN URBAN DESIGN (2012), Vormgeven aan de spontane stad, The Hague, Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving. Google Scholar

SCHMIDT, S., NEMETH, J. and BOTSFORD, E. (2011), ‘The evolution of privately owned public spaces in New York City’, Urban Design International, 16, 270–84. The evolution of privately owned public spaces in New York City Urban Design International 16 270 84 Google Scholar

SMITH, N. (1996), The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, London, Routledge. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City Google Scholar

SMITH, N. and COWEN, D. (2007), ‘Suburban Manhattan’, in J. Hammet and K. Hammet (eds), The Suburbanisation of New York: Is the World’s Greatest City Becoming Just Another Town?, New York, Princeton Architectural Press. Suburban Manhattan The Suburbanisation of New York: Is the World’s Greatest City Becoming Just Another Town? Google Scholar

SMITHSIMON, G. (2008), ‘Dispersing the crowd: bonus plazas and the creation of public space’, Urban Affairs Review, 43, 325–51. Dispersing the crowd: bonus plazas and the creation of public space Urban Affairs Review 43 325 51 Google Scholar

SORKIN, M. (ed.) (1992), Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space, New York, Noonday Press. Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space Google Scholar

STAEHELI, L. A. and MITCHELL, D. (2007), ‘Locating the public in research and practice’, Progress in Human Geography, 31, 792–811. Locating the public in research and practice Progress in Human Geography 31 792 811 Google Scholar

STAEHELI, L. A., and MITCHELL, D. (2006), ‘USA’s destiny? Regulating space and creating community in American shopping malls’, Urban Studies, 43, 977–92. USA’s destiny? Regulating space and creating community in American shopping malls Urban Studies 43 977 92 Google Scholar

STEVENS, Q. (2009), ‘“Broken” public spaces in theory and in practice’, Town Planning Review, 80, 371–92. “Broken” public spaces in theory and in practice Town Planning Review 80 371 92 Google Scholar

STOLK, S. (2013), ‘New York groener door privaat initiatief ’, Agora, 29, 12–15. New York groener door privaat initiatief Agora 29 12 15 Google Scholar

SYMES, S. and STEEL, M. (2003), ‘Lessons from America: the role of business improvement districts as an agent of urban regeneration’, Town Planning Review, 74, 301–13. Lessons from America: the role of business improvement districts as an agent of urban regeneration Town Planning Review 74 301 13 Google Scholar

TASAN-KOK, T. and BAETEN, G. (eds) (2012), Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning: Cities, Policies and Politics, Heidelberg, Springer. Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning: Cities, Policies and Politics Google Scholar

TILSTRA, T. (2013), ‘Culemborgse pioniers van het zelfbeheer’, Agora, 29, 16–19. Culemborgse pioniers van het zelfbeheer Agora 29 16 19 Google Scholar

VAN AALST, I., VAN MELIK, R. and VAN WEESEP, J. (2007), ‘Midtown: Publieke ruimte in private handen’, Geografie, 16, 13–17. Midtown: Publieke ruimte in private handen Geografie 16 13 17 Google Scholar

VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and HEURKENS, E. (2014), ‘Netherlands: a search for alternative public-private development strategies from neighbouring countries’, in G. Squires and E. Heurkens (eds), International Approaches to Real Estate Development,Milton Park, Routledge, 66–81. Netherlands: a search for alternative public-private development strategies from neighbouring countries International Approaches to Real Estate Development 66 81 Google Scholar

VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and JACOBS, H. M. (2013), ‘Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience’, Land Use Policy, 30, 774–73. Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience Land Use Policy 30 774 73 Google Scholar

VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and NEEDHAM, D. B. (2008), ‘Land readjustment for value capturing: a new planning tool for urban redevelopment’, Town Planning Review, 79, 651–71. Land readjustment for value capturing: a new planning tool for urban redevelopment Town Planning Review 79 651 71 Google Scholar

VAN MELIK, R. (2008), Changing Public Space: The Recent Redevelopment of Dutch City Squares, Utrecht, KNAG/Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University. Changing Public Space: The Recent Redevelopment of Dutch City Squares Google Scholar

VAN MELIK, R. (2013), ‘Coproductie van groene openbare ruimte: ‘loss’ of oplossing?’, Agora, 29, 8–11. Coproductie van groene openbare ruimte: ‘loss’ of oplossing? Agora 29 8 11 Google Scholar

VAN MELIK, R. and VAN AALST, I. (2011), ‘Lappendeken van investeringszones: Business Improvement Districts in Manhattan’, Geografie, 20, 23–27. Lappendeken van investeringszones: Business Improvement Districts in Manhattan Geografie 20 23 27 Google Scholar

VISSER, P. and VAN DAM, F. (2006), De prijs van de plek: Woonomgeving en woonprijs, Rotterdam, NAi Publishers. De prijs van de plek: Woonomgeving en woonprijs Google Scholar

WARD, K. (2006), ‘“Policies in motion”, urban management and state restructuring: the trans-local expansion of Business Improvement Districts’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 54–75. “Policies in motion”, urban management and state restructuring: the trans-local expansion of Business Improvement Districts International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 54 75 Google Scholar

WEBSTER, C. (2007), ‘Property rights, public space and urban design’, Town Planning Review, 78, 81–101. Property rights, public space and urban design Town Planning Review 78 81 101 Google Scholar

WEBSTER, C. and LAI, L. W. (2003), Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing. Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities Google Scholar

YOON, H. and SRINIVASAN, S. (2015), ‘Are they well situated? Spatial analysis of privately owned public space, Manhattan, New York City’, Urban Affairs Review, 51, 358–80. Are they well situated? Spatial analysis of privately owned public space, Manhattan, New York City Urban Affairs Review 51 358 80 Google Scholar

ZUKIN, S. (1995), The Cultures of Cities, Oxford, Blackwell. The Cultures of Cities Google Scholar