Town Planning Review

Planning decision-making: independence, subsidiarity, impartiality and the state

Town Planning Review (2016), 87, (1), 53–70.

Abstract

This paper explores recent changes that involve the Planning Inspectorate in England, considering as part of this the relevance and value of independence and impartiality in effective decision-making, together with a consideration of the significance of these changes in the context of localism and the subsidiarity narrative. To inform this debate, this paper focuses upon the value of having an independent body for planning decisions through a comparison with the Planning Appeals Commission (PAC) in Northern Ireland. The paper points towards the potential need for change in the structural approach and arrangements of the system in England, drawing particularly upon the PAC as a potential model for consideration.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

BARKER, K. (2006), Review of Land Use Planning, London, HMSO. Review of Land Use Planning Google Scholar

BOOTH, P. (2003), Planning By Consent: The Origins and Nature of British Development Control, London, Routledge. Planning By Consent: The Origins and Nature of British Development Control Google Scholar

CPRE (CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND) (2004), The Facts About Planning Appeals, http://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/housing-and-planning/planning/item/1905 (accessed 15 October 2014). Google Scholar

COUNCIL OF EUROPE (2010), European Convention on Human Rights, www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf (accessed 15 October 2014). Google Scholar

ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE (2000a), The Environmental Court Project: Final Report by Malcolm Grant, London, The Stationery Office. Google Scholar

ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE (2000b), Thirteenth Report – The Planning Inspectorate and Public Inquiries – Volume 1 – Report and Proceedings of the Committee, London, The Stationery Office. Google Scholar

EPSTEIN, R. (2007), ‘Is the parole board sufficiently independent? R (on the application of Michael Brooke and Gagik Ter-Ogannisyan) v The Parole Board’, The Times, 18 October 2007. Is the parole board sufficiently independent? R (on the application of Michael Brooke and Gagik Ter-Ogannisyan) v The Parole Board The Times Google Scholar

GREAT BRITAIN LORD CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE (1957), Report of the Committee on Administrative Tribunals and Enquiries, London, HMSO. Google Scholar

LLOYD, G. M. and PEEL, D. (2012), ‘Planning reform in Northern Ireland: Planning Act (Northern Ireland) 2011’, Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 177–82. Planning reform in Northern Ireland: Planning Act (Northern Ireland) 2011 Planning Theory & Practice 13 177 82 Google Scholar

MCAUSLAN, P. (1980), The Ideologies of Planning Law, Oxford, Pergamon Press. The Ideologies of Planning Law Google Scholar

MURTAGH, B. (2001), ‘Integrated social housing in Northern Ireland’, Housing Studies, 16, 771–89. Integrated social housing in Northern Ireland Housing Studies 16 771 89 Google Scholar

PLANNING INSPECTORATE (2012), Code of Conduct, www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/...inspectors/code_of_conduct.pdf (accessed 15 October 2014). Google Scholar

ROZEE, L. (2000), ‘The work of the Planning Inspectorate – Moving into the new millennium’, (address to Planning Summer School). The work of the Planning Inspectorate – Moving into the new millennium Google Scholar

TURNER, S. (2006), ‘Transforming environmental governance in Northern Ireland. Part one: the process of policy renewal’, Journal of Environmental Law, 18, 55–87. Transforming environmental governance in Northern Ireland. Part one: the process of policy renewal Journal of Environmental Law 18 55 87 Google Scholar

UK GOVERNMENT (1968), Town and Country Planning Act 1968, London, HMSO. Google Scholar

UK GOVERNMENT (1991), Planning (Northern Ireland) Order 1991, London, HMSO. Google Scholar

UK GOVERNMENT (2011), Planning Act (Northern Ireland) 2011, London, HMSO. Google Scholar

UK GOVERNMENT (2013), Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013, London, HMSO. Google Scholar

UK GOVERNMENT (2014), Planning Bill (Northern Ireland) 2014, London, HMSO. Google Scholar

WARTH, T. (2012), ‘National or local: where should planning appeals be decided?’ MA dissertation, University of the West of England (unpublished). National or local: where should planning appeals be decided? Google Scholar

WILLEY, S. (2005), ‘Are planning appeal rights necessary? A comparative study of Australia, England and Vancouver BC’, Progress in Planning, 63, 265–320. Are planning appeal rights necessary? A comparative study of Australia, England and Vancouver BC Progress in Planning 63 265 320 Google Scholar

WILLEY, S. (2007), ‘Planning appeal processes: reflections on a comparative study’, Environment and Planning, 39, 1676–98. Planning appeal processes: reflections on a comparative study Environment and Planning 39 1676 98 Google Scholar

WRAITH, R. E. and LAMB, G. B. (1971), Public Inquiries as an Instrument of Government, London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Public Inquiries as an Instrument of Government Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Sheppard, Adam

Ritchie, Heather