Labour History

A Republican History of Australia

Labour History (2014), 107, (1), 197–209.

Abstract

In post-1788 Australia, we can identify three versions of republicanism: firstly as a specific ideology for the Australian nation; secondly as a political movement to break ties with the British Crown; and thirdly as a set of initiatives collectively defined as deliberative democracy. As ideology, republicanism has roots in both civic republicanism and liberal democratic radicalism. It has sometimes been nationalist and racist (the Great Australian Settlement) and sometimes liberal and multicultural (the New Australia of the 1960s). Unity around establishing legal and cultural independence has been achievable but, when it comes to a break with the Crown, there are divided views on its necessity and on the form a republic should take. In the 1990s, when the movement for change was at its height, these differences proved too much to handle and the referendum to establish a republic in 1999 was lost. It is argued that only through an exercise in new democracy involving random selection and proper deliberation — “a republican means for a republican end” — will it be possible to create the trust and authority needed for change.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

 Google Scholar

Footnotes

1.Quoted inMark McKenna, “‘I Wonder Whether I Belong’: Manning Clark and the Politics of Australian History 1970–2000,” Australian Historical Studies 34, no. 122(2003):382. Google Scholar

2.SeeGeoff Gallop, “The Road to Labor,” WA Today, 21 September2011. Google Scholar

3.For an alternative approach seeMark McKenna, “The Traditions of Australian Republicanism,” Australian Parliamentary Library Research Paper 31(1995–96), accessed September 2014,http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/RP9596/96rp31. Google Scholar

4.SeeJ. G. A. Pocock, ed., Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688 and 1776(:Princeton University Press, 1980); andBenjamin Thomas Jones, “Colonial Republicanism: Re-examining the Impact of Civic Republican Ideology in Pre-Constitution New South Wales,” Journal of Australian Colonial History 11(2009):129–46. Google Scholar

5. The Tribune: A Periodical Publication Consisting Chiefly of the Political Lectures of J. Thelwall, 3 volumes(:1795–96), vol. 2, 234. Google Scholar

6.James Harrington, “The Commonwealth of Oceana,”1656, inThe Political Works of James Harrington, ed.J. G. A. Pocock(:Cambridge University Press, 1977), 164. Google Scholar

7.SeeTony Blackshield andGeorge Williams, ed., Australian Constitutional Law and Theory, 5th ed. (:Federation Press, 2010):110–51. Google Scholar

8.Quoted inMark McKenna andWayne Hudson, ed., Australian Republicanism: A Reader(:Melbourne University Press, 2003), 50. Google Scholar

9.Bruce McFarlane, “From Penal Colony to Republic?”inAustralia: A Survey, ed.V. G. Venturini(:Otto Harrassowitz, 1970), 261. Google Scholar

10.William Charles Wentworth, “Australasia: A Poem Written for The Chancellor’s Medal at the Cambridge Commencement,”1823, accessed September 2014,http://www.lib.mq.edu.au/digital/lema/1823/australasia2.html. See alsoHumphrey McQueen, A New Britannia: An Argument Concerning the Social Origins of Australian Radicalism(:Penguin, 1970). Google Scholar

11.David Black, ed., In His Own Words: John Curtin’s Speeches and Writings(:Paradigm Books, 1995), 237. Google Scholar

12.Quoted inIbid., 242. Google Scholar

13.For Lang, seeMcKenna andHudson, AustralianRepublicanism, 45–46;ibid., 93, for Lawson;ibid., 149, for Crouch. Google Scholar

14.Louis Nowra, “Writers Eager to March with Our Tinpot Fascists,” The Australian, 21 July2012. Google Scholar

15.Donald Horne, The Lucky Country, 5th ed. (:Penguin, 2005), 106, 233. Google Scholar

16.SeeGough Whitlam, The Truth Matter of the Matter(:Penguin Books, 1979). Google Scholar

17.SeeMichael Kirby “The Australian Republican Referendum 1999: Ten Lessons”(lecture at Faculty of Law,University of Birmingham,, 3 March2000), accessed September 2014,http://www.lawfoundation.net.au/ljf/app/DF4206863AE3C52DCA2571A30082B3D5.html. Google Scholar

18.Quentin Bryce, “Advance Australia Fair,” Boyer Lecture, ABC, November 2013, accessed September 2014,http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/boyerlectures/advance-australia-fair/4998512#transcript. Google Scholar

19. “Our Pledge,” Australian Republican Movement, accessed September 2014,http://www.ouridentity.org.au/. Google Scholar

20.John Dryzek, “The Australian Citizens’ Parliament: A World First,” Papers on Parliament, no. 51 (June2009):39. Google Scholar

21.Janet Hartz-Karp, “How and Why Deliberative Democracy Enables Co-Intelligence and Brings Wisdom to Governance,” Journal of Public Deliberation 3, no. 1, article 6 (2007):3–4. Google Scholar

22. “Australia Citizens’ Parliament (2009),”newDemocracy Foundation, accessed September 2014,http://www.newdemocracy.com.au/our-work/item/137. Google Scholar

23.SeeHon Alannah MacTiernan “Harmonizing Divergent Voices: Sharing the Challenge of Decision Making,”(keynote address,Institute of Public Administration Australia NSW, State Conference,, 2004);Geoff Gallop, “What is newDemocracy?”(lecture at the Hawke Centre,University of South Australia,, 20 November2013). Google Scholar

24.SeeJanet Hartz-Karp, “A Case Study in Deliberative Democracy: Dialogue with the City,” Journal of Public Deliberation 1, no. 1, article 6 (2005). Google Scholar

25. “Constitutional Convention (Ireland),” Wikipedia, accessed September 2014,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Convention_(Ireland). Google Scholar

26.Yves Sintomer, “Random Selection, Republican Self-Government, and Deliberative Democracy,” Constellations 17, no 3, (2010):472, 480. Google Scholar

27.SeeMcKenna, “I Wonder Whether I Belong,” 368, 375. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Gallop, Geoff