Labour History

The Australian Place in Comparative Labour History

Labour History (2011), 100, (1), 167–188.

Abstract

The conceptualisation of labour history has traditionally focused on national working classes and organised labour movements, although its Australian variants have always been implicitly informed by a comparative perspective based on notions of the ‘Workingman’s Paradise’. In the past three or more decades explicitly comparative labour history in Australia has undergone significant expansion, led byLabour History. Although there are numerous comparative approaches, national institutional comparisons of a small number of similar - Anglo Saxon, settler - countries dominate these efforts. This approach has by no means exhausted its possibilities, but comparative endeavours also need to expand beyond it to realise the comparative potential. There have been beginnings with comparisons of social trends and themes, such as racism, gender, and urbanisation to name just some. Perhaps the greatest potential for breaking free from the shackles of ‘methodological nationalism’ lies in transnational historiographical approaches, focusing on shared experiences and processes beyond national boundaries.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Endnotes

1.E.J. Hobsbawm, ‘What is the workers’ country?’, inWorlds of Labour: Further Studies in the History of Labour,Weidenfeld and Nicolson,, 1984, p.49. Google Scholar

2.S. Berger andG. Patmore, ‘Comparative labour history in Britain and Australia’, Labour History, no.88, May2005, p.9. Google Scholar

3.Berger andPatmore, ‘Comparative labour history in Britain and Australia’, p.10;V.E. Bonnell, ‘The uses of theory, concepts and comparison in historical sociology’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol.22, no.2, 1980, pp.164-65. Google Scholar

4.G. Kealey andG. Patmore, ‘Comparative labour history: Australia and Canada’, inG. Kealey andG. Patmore(eds), Australia and Canada: Labour Compared(joint issue ofLabour/Le Travail, no.38;Labour History, no.71), Fall/November1996, pp.3-4;R. Bean, Comparative Industrial Relations: An Introduction to Cross-National Perspectives,Croom Helm,, 1985;G. Cross, ‘Labour in settler-state democracies: Comparative perspectives on Australia and the US, 1860-1920’, Labour History, no.70, 1996, pp.1-24;D. Denoon, Settler Capitalism: The Dynamics of Dependent Development in the Southern Hemisphere,Oxford University Press,, 1983;J.P. Fogarty, ‘The comparative method and the nineteenth century regions of recent settlement’, Historical Studies, vol.19, no.7, 1981, pp.412-29;P.A. Hall andD. Soskice(eds),‘An introduction to varieties of capitalism’, inVarieties of Capitalism: Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage,Cambridge University Press,, 2001, pp.1-78;U. Becker, Open Varieties of Capitalism. Capitalism, Change and Performances,Palgrave Macmillan,, 2009;C.M. Frege andJ. Kelly(eds), Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy,Oxford University Press,, 2004;J. Breuilly, ‘Comparative labour history’, Labour History Review, vol.55, no.3, 1990, pp.6-9. Google Scholar

5.Berger andPatmore, ‘Comparative labour history in Britain and Australia’, pp.10-11;G. Strauss, ‘Comparative international industrial relations’, inK. Whitfield andG. Strauss(eds), Researching in the World of Work: Strategies and Methods in Studying Industrial Relations,Cornell University Press,, 1998, p.187. Google Scholar

6.B. Ellem andJ. Shields, ‘Rethinking “regional industrial relations”: Space, place and the social relations of work’, Journal of Industrial Relations, vol.41, no.4, December1999, pp.536-60;B. Ellem, ‘Scaling labour: Australian unions and global mining’, Work, Employment and Society, vol.20, no.2, June2006, pp.369-88;J. Peck, Work-Place: The Social Regulation of Labour Markets,Guildford Press,, 1996;D. Massey, Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production, 2ndedition,Macmillan,, 1995. Google Scholar

7.N. Brenner, ‘Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organisation and the historical geography of spatial scales’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol.16, 1998, pp.459-81;B. Ellem andJ. Shields, ‘Placing peak union purpose and power: The origins, dominance and decline of the Barrier Industrial Council’, Economics and Labour Relations Review, vol.11, no.2, pp.61-84;Ellem andShields, ‘Rethinking “Regional Industrial Relations”’;R. Markey andS. Nixon, ‘Peak unionism in the Illawarra’, inB. Ellem,R. Markey andJ. Shields(eds), Peak Unions in Australia: Origins, Purpose, Power, Agency,Federation Press,, 2004, pp.152-81;L. Taksa, ‘Like a bicycle, forever teetering between individualism and collectivism: Considering community in relation to labour history’, Labour History, no.78, May2000, pp.7-32. Google Scholar

8.E. Faue, ‘Community, class and comparison in labour history and local history’, Labour History, no.78, May2000, pp.155-62.Berger andPatmore did not include this article in their review ofLabour Historycontributions to comparative labour historiography,‘Comparative labour history in Britain and Australia’, pp.18-19. Google Scholar

9.G. Patmore, ‘Community and Australian labour history’, inT. Irving, Challenges to Labour History,UNSW Press,, 1994, pp.169-88. Google Scholar

10.Kealey andPatmore, ‘Comparative labour history: Australia and Canada’, pp.1-2. Google Scholar

11.Van der Linden, ‘Labour history: An international movement’, pp.228-29. Google Scholar

12.C. Kerr,J.T. Dunlop,E.H. Harbison andC.A. Myers, Industrialism and Industrial Man: The Problems of Labour and Management in Economic Growth,Penguin,, 1960;G.J. Bamber,R.D. Lansbury andN. Wailes, ‘Introduction’, inG.J. Bamber,R.D. Lansbury andN. Wailes(eds), International and Comparative Employment Relations: Globalisation and the Developed Market Economies, 4thedition,Allen & Unwin,, 2004, pp.13-26. Google Scholar

13.J. Norton, ‘Introduction’, inJ. Norton(ed.), The History of Capital and Labour in All Lands and Ages,Oceanic Publishing,, 1888, p.ix;W.G. Spence, Australia’s Awakening: Thirty Years in the Life of an Australian Agitator,Worker Trustees,, 1909. Google Scholar

14.B. Fitzpatrick, A Short History of the Australian Labor Movement,Macmillan,, 1968(originally published1940), especially ch. 10;R. Gollan, Radical and Working Class Politics: A Study of Eastern Australia, 1850-1910,Melbourne University Press,, 1960, chs 9-11;N.B. Nairn, Civilising Capitalism: The Labor Movement in New South Wales, 1870-1900,ANU Press,, 1973, especially chs 15-16. Google Scholar

15.R. Ward, The Australian Legend,Oxford University Press,, 1958. Google Scholar

16.Notably H. McQueen, A New Britannia: An Argument Concerning the Social Origins of Australian Radicalism and Nationalism,Penguin,, 1970. Google Scholar

17.SeeM. Hearn andH. Knowles, One Big Union: A History of the Australian Workers’ Union 1886-1994,Cambridge University Press,, 1996, pp.12-13; various contributions inM. Hearn andG. Patmore, Working the Nation: Working Life and Federation, 1890-1914,Pluto Press,, 2001. Google Scholar

18.See various contributions, but especiallyS. Macintyre, ‘Federation and the labour movement’, inHearn andPatmore, Working the Nation, pp.11-28. Google Scholar

19.J. Bennett, ‘Rats and Revolutionaries’: The Labour Movements in Australia and New Zealand, 1890-1940,Otago University Press,, 2004, pp.59-60. Google Scholar

20.R. Markey, ‘Federation and labour: The national, state and local dimensions’, inHearn andPatmore, Working the Nation, pp.98-115. Google Scholar

21.N. Kirk, Comrades and Cousins: Globalization, Workers and Labour Movements in the USA and Australia from the 1880s to 1914,Merlin Press,, 2003, pp.59-148. Google Scholar

22.Norton, History of Capital and Labour. Google Scholar

23.W.E. Murphy, History of the Eight Hours’ Movement, 2vols,Spectator/Picken,, 1896and1900. Google Scholar

24.F.J. Turner, The Frontier in American History,Holt, Rinehart and Winston,, 1921. Google Scholar

25.L.G. Churchward, ‘The American influence on the Australian labour movement’, Historical Studies, vol.5, no.19, 1952, pp.258-70. Google Scholar

26.I. Bedford, ‘The Industrial Workers of the World in Australia’, Labour History, no.13, 1967, pp.40-46;V. Burgmann, ‘Antipodean peculiarities: Comparing the Australian IWW with the American’, Labor History, vol.40, no.3, 1999, pp.371-92. Google Scholar

27.Frank Cain, The Wobblies at War: A History of the IWW and the Great War in Australia,Spectrum Publications,, 1993. Google Scholar

28.F. Farrell, International Socialism and Australian Labour: The Left in Australia,Hale & Iremonger,, 1981. Google Scholar

29.G.D.H. Cole, A History of Socialist Thought, Volume III, The Second International, 1889-1914, part 2,Macmillan,, 1956, ch. 23;Volume IV, Communism and Social Democracy, 1914-31, part 2,Macmillan,, 1958, ch. 28. Google Scholar

30.S. Macintyre, The Reds: The Communist Party of Australia from Origins to Illegality,Allen & Unwin,, 1998. Google Scholar

31.See various contributions inT. Irving(ed.), Challenges to Labour History,UNSW Press,, 1994, especiallyS. Garton, ‘What have we done? Labour history, social history, cultural history’, pp.42-62. Google Scholar

32.M. Sampson, ‘Recent criticism of labour history in Britain and Australia’, Labour History, no.36, May1976, pp.70-93. Google Scholar

33.V. Burgmann, ‘Labour/Le Travail and Canadian working class history: A view from afar’, Labour/Le Travail, no.50, Fall2002, pp.73-88. Google Scholar

34.Notably Bean, Comparative Industrial Relation; andBamber,Lansbury andWailes, International and Comparative Employment Relations. Google Scholar

35.SeeBamber,Lansbury andWailes, ‘Introduction’in Bamber, Lansbury and Wailes, International and Comparative Employment Relations. Google Scholar

36.B. Fitzpatrick, British Imperialism and Australia 1783-1833: An Economic History of Australasia,Sydney University Press,, 1971(originally publishedAllen & Unwin,, 1939);B. Fitzpatrick, The British Empire in Australia 1834-1939,Macmillan,, 1969(originally publishedMelbourne University Press,, 1941). Google Scholar

37.McQueen, A New Britannia, pp.21-41. Google Scholar

38.K. Buckley andE.L. Wheelwright, No Paradise for Workers: Capitalism and the Common People in Australia, 1788-1914,Oxford University Press,, 1988;K. Buckley andE.L. Wheelwright, False Paradise: Australian Capitalism Revisited, 1915-55,Oxford University Press,, 1998. Google Scholar

39.D. Clark, ‘Australia: Victim or partner of British imperialism?’, inE.L. Wheelwright andK. Buckley(eds), Essays in the Political Economy of Australian Capitalism, vol.1,Australia and New Zealand Book Company,, 1975, pp.33-46;P. Fitzpatrick, ‘“Really rather like slavery”: Law and labour in the colonial economy of Papua New Guinea’, in Wheelwright and Buckley, Essays in the Political Economy of Australian Capitalism, vol.3, pp.102-18;M. Beresford andP. Kerr, ‘A turning point for Australian capitalism, 1942-52’, inE.L. Wheelwright andK. Buckley(eds), Essays in the Political Economy of Australian Capitalism, vol.4,Australia and New Zealand Book Company,, 1980, pp.148-71;W. Armstrong andJ. Bradbury, ‘Industrialisation and class structure in Australia, Canada and Argentina, 1870 to 1980’, inE.L. Wheelwright andK. Buckley(eds), Essays in the Political Economy of Australian Capitalism, vol.5,Australia and New Zealand Book Company,, 1983, pp.43-74. Google Scholar

40.Berger andPatmore, ‘Comparative labour history in Britain and Australia’. Google Scholar

41.E.J. Hobsbawm, Primitive Rebels,Manchester University Press,, 1959. Also many other examples over 40 years, too numerous to list here. Google Scholar

42.E. Fry, ‘Report: First British Commonwealth Labour History Conference’, Labour History, no.42, May1982, pp.124-25;H. Katz, ‘Report: The Commonwealth Labour History Conference, Coventry, 2-4 September 1981’, Bulletin of the Society for the Study of Labour History, no.44, Spring1982, pp.12-13. Google Scholar

43.Kealey andPatmore, ‘Comparative labour history: Australia and Canada’, pp.4-5. Google Scholar

44.Berger and Patmore, ‘Comparative labour history in Britain and Australia’, p.18. Google Scholar

45.See various articles inKealey andPatmore, Australia and Canada: Labour Compared;G. Patmore(ed.),‘Australia/UK comparative labour history’, Labour History, no.88, May2005;R. Markey andK. Taylor(eds),‘Trans-Tasman labour history’, Labour History, no.95, November2008. Google Scholar

46.M. Van der Linden andJ. Rojahn(eds), The Formation of Labour Movements, 1870-1914: An International Perspective,Brill,, 1990;R. Markey, ‘Australia’, inVan der Linden andRojahn, The Formation of Labour Movements, 1870-1914, pp.579-608. Google Scholar

47.For example,Bamber,Lansbury andWailes, International and Comparative Employment Relations. Google Scholar

48.E. Fry(ed.), Common Cause: Essays in Australian and New Zealand Labour History,Allen & Unwin,, 1986. Google Scholar

49.Ellen McEwen’s contribution, however, did make extensive comparisons between Australian and British coalmining:E. McEwen, ‘Coalminers in Newcastle, New South Wales: A labour aristocracy?’, in Fry, Common Cause, pp.77-92. Google Scholar

50.Kealey andPatmore, Australia and Canada: Labour Compared;Patmore(ed.),‘Australia/UK Comparative labour history’;Markey andTaylor(eds),‘Trans-Tasman labour history’. Google Scholar

51.L. James andR. Markey, ‘Class and labour: The British Labour Party and the Australian Labor Party compared’, Labour History, no.90, May2006, pp.23-42. Google Scholar

52.Cross, ‘Labour in settler-state democracies’. Google Scholar

53.M. Barry andN. Wailes, ‘Contrasting systems? 100 years of arbitration in Australia and New Zealand’, Journal of Industrial Relations, vol.46, no.4, December2004, pp.430-47. Google Scholar

54.G. Patmore, ‘The origins of federal industrial relations systems: Australia, Canada and the USA’, Journal of Industrial Relations, vol.51, no.2, April2009, pp.151-72. Google Scholar

55.A. Scott, Running on Empty: ‘Modernising’ the British and Australian Labour Parties,Pluto Press, 2000. Google Scholar

56.L. Taksa, ‘The cultural diffusion of scientific management: The United States and New South Wales’, Journal of Industrial Relations, vol.37, no.3, September1995, pp.427-61. Google Scholar

57.M. Quinlan andM. Gardner, ‘Strikes, worker protest, and union growth in Canada and Australia, 1815-1900’, Labour/Le Travail, no.36, 1995, pp.175-208. Google Scholar

58.N. Fischer, ‘The Australian Right, the American Right and the threat of the Left, 1917-35’, Labour History, no.89, November2005, pp.17-36. Google Scholar

59.D. Clément, ‘“It is not the beliefs but the crime that matters”: Post-war civil liberties debates in Canada and Australia’, Labour History, no.86, May2004, pp.1-32. Google Scholar

60.J. Dickenson, Renegades and Rats: Betrayal and the Remaking of Radical Organisations in Britain and Australia,Melbourne University Press,, 2006. Google Scholar

61.R. Frances andB. Scates, Women, Work and the Labour Movement in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand, a special issue ofLabour History, no.61, November1991. Google Scholar

62.J. Crew, ‘Women’s wages in Britain and Australia during the First World War’, Labour History, no.57, November1989, pp.27-43. Google Scholar

63.F. Shor, ‘“Virile syndicalism” in comparative perspective: A gender analysis of the IWW in the United States and Australia’, International Labor and Working Class History, no.56, Fall1999, pp.65-77;F. Shor, ‘Gender and labour/Working class history in comparative perspective: The syndicalist and Wobbly experience in the USA, Australia, and New Zealand’, Left History, vol.11, no.2, 2006, pp.118-36. Google Scholar

64.M. Fletcher, ‘Modernity or “Slaves of the Lamp”? Independence and control in two state coal mining communities in Victoria, Australia’, inS. Berger,A. Coll andN. Laporte(eds), Towards a Comparative History of Coalfields Societies,Ashgate,, 2005, pp.99-112. Google Scholar

65.G. Patmore, ‘Iron and steel unionism in Canada and Australia, 1900-1914: The impact of the state, ethnicity, management, and locality’, Labour/Le Travail, no.58, Fall2006, pp.71-105. Google Scholar

66.E. Roberts, ‘Gender in store: Salespeople’s working hours and union organisation in New Zealand and the United States, 1930-60’, Labour History, no.83, November2002, pp.107-30. Google Scholar

67.J. Hagan andA. Wells(eds), Industrial Relations in Australia and Japan,Allen & Unwin,, 1994. Google Scholar

68.M. Huberman andC. Minns, ‘The times they are not changin’: Days and hours of work in Old and New Worlds, 1870-2000’, Explorations in Economic History, vol.44, issue4, October2007, pp.538-67. Google Scholar

69.M. van der Linden andR. Price(eds), The Rise and Development of Collective Labour Law,Peter Lang,, 2000. Australian contribution:R. Markey, ‘The development of collective labour law in Australia, 1788-1914’, pp.43-78. Google Scholar

70.M. van der Linden(ed.), Social Security Mutualism: The Comparative History of Mutual Benefit Societies,Peter Lang,, 1996. Australian Contribution:R. Markey, ‘The history of mutual benefit societies in Australia, 1830-1991’, pp.147-76. Google Scholar

71.T. Brass andM. van der Linden(eds), Free and Unfree Labour: The Debate Continues,Peter Lang,, 1997. Australian contribution:R. Markey, ‘Free and unfree labour in Australia, 1788-1900’, pp.457-78. Google Scholar

72.A. Blok,K. Hitchins,R. Markey andB. Simonson(eds), Urban Radicals, Rural Allies: Social Democracy and the Agrarian Issue, 1870-1914,Peter Lang,, 2002. Australian contributions:R. Markey, ‘Social democracy and the agrarian issue, 1870-1914’, pp.9-22;R. Markey ‘Social democracy and the agrarian issue: Australia, 1870-1914’, pp.111-44. Google Scholar

73.M. van der Linden andJ. Lucassen(eds), Racism and the Labour Market: Historical Studies,Peter Lang,, 1995. Australian contribution:R. Markey, ‘Race and organized labour in a white settler society: The Australian case, 1850-1901’, pp.345-72. Google Scholar

74.SeeR. Howe, ‘A paradise for working men but not working women: Women’s wagework and protective legislation in Australia, 1890-1914’, inU. Wilkander,A. Kessler-Harris andJ. Lewis(eds), Protecting Women: Labor Legislation in Europe, the United States, and Australia, 1880-1920,University of Illinois Press,, 1995, pp.318-36. Google Scholar

75.A. Markus, Fear and Hatred: Purifying Australia and California, 1850-1901,Hale & Iremonger,, 1979. Google Scholar

76.N. Kirk, ‘Traditionalists and progressives: Labor, race, and immigration in post-World War II Australia and Britain’, Australian Historical Studies, vol.39, no.1, 2008, pp.53-71. Google Scholar

77.N. Wailes,G. Ramia, andR. Lansbury, ‘Interests, institutions and industrial relations’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, vol.41, no.5, December2003, pp.617-37. Google Scholar

78.SeeMcEwen, ‘Coalminers in Newcastle, New South Wales: a labour aristocracy?’. Google Scholar

79.R. Gollan, ‘American populism and Australian utopianism’, Labour History, no.9, May1965, pp.15-21;P. Love, Labour and the Money Power: Australian Labour Populism, 1890-1950,Melbourne University Press,, 1984, ch. 1;R. Markey, ‘Populism and the formation of a Labor Party in NSW, 1890-1900’, Journal of Australian Studies, no.20, May1987, pp.38-48. Google Scholar

80.SeeB. Scates, ANew Australia: Citizenship, Radicalism and the First Republic,Cambridge University Press,, 1997. Google Scholar

81.G. Patmore, ‘Australian labor historiography: The influence of the USA’, Labor History, vol.37, no.4, Autumn1996, pp.520-34. Google Scholar

82.F. Cain, The Wobblies at War;V. Burgmann, Revolutionary Industrial Unionism: The Industrial Workers of the World in Australia,Cambridge University Press,, 1995. Both cited in Berger and Patmore,‘Comparative labour history in Britain and Australia’, p.17. Google Scholar

83.For example,A. Jones, ‘“Sindicalistas Australianos”: A case study of international trade unionism’, Labour History, no.93, November2007, 197-212;G. Cresciani, ‘Italian anti-fascism in Australia, 1922-45’, inE.L. Wheelwright andK. Buckley(eds), Essays in the Political Economy of Australian Capitalism, vol.3,Australia and New Zealand Book Company,, 1978, pp.86-101. Google Scholar

84.For example,C. Hickey, ‘“His tap root was stronger and more tenacious than most of us”: Robert Semple, an Australian New Zealander’, Labour History, no.95, November2008, pp.169-84. Google Scholar

85.I.W. Mclean, ‘Why was Australia so rich?’, Explorations in Economic History, vol.44, 2007, pp.635-56. Google Scholar

86.R. Archer, Why is There No Labor Party in the United States?,Princeton University Press,, 2007. See alsoR. Archer, ‘American liberalism and labour politics: Labour leaders and liberty language in late nineteenth century Australia and the United States’, Labour History, no.92, May2007, pp.1-16;R. McKibbon, ‘Why was there no Marxism in Great Britain?’, English Historical Review, vol.XCIX, no.CCXCI, 1984, pp.297-331. Google Scholar

87.M. van der Linden, ‘Globalizing labour historiography: The IISH approach’, International Institute of Social History, 2002:www.iisg.nl/research(accessed 20 May 2010). Numerous publications have been spawned by the Institute (IISH) including in theInternational Review of Social Historyand the following books:M. van der Linden andP.P. Mohapatra(eds), Labour Matters: Towards Global Histories: Studies in Honour of Sabyasachi Bhattacharya,Tulika Books,, 2009;M. van der Linden(ed.), Workers of the World: Essays Towards a Global Labour History,Brill,, 2008;J. Lucassen(ed.), Global Labour History: A State of the Art,Peter Lang,, 2006;M. van der Linden(ed.), Transnational Labour History,Ashgate,, 2003, amongst others. Google Scholar

88.M. van der Linden, ‘Labour history: An international movement’, Labour History, no.89, November2005, p.229. Google Scholar

89.P. Linebaugh andM. Rediker, The Many-Headed Hydra: The Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic,Verso,, 2000, p.2. Google Scholar

90.Ibid., p.4. Google Scholar

91.Markus, Fear and Hatred. Google Scholar

92.C. McConville, ‘Waterfront unionism in three ports: Buenos Aires, Melbourne and San Francisco’, inD. Palmer,R. Shanahan andM. Shanahan(eds), Australian Labour History Reconsidered,Australian Humanities Press,, 1999, pp.75-88. Google Scholar

93.J. Roe(ed.), Unemployment: Are There Lessons from History?,Hale & Iremonger,, 1985. Google Scholar

94.B. Kennedy, A Tale of Two Mining Cities: Johannesburg and Broken Hill, 1885-1925,Melbourne University Press,, 1984. Google Scholar

95.Kealey andPatmore, ‘Comparative labour history: Australia and Canada’, p.5. Google Scholar

96.N. Kirk, Comrades and Cousins: Globalization, Workers and Labour Movements in Britain, the USA and Australia from the 1880s to 1914,The Merlin Press,, 2003. Google Scholar

97.S. Stromquist, ‘“Thinking globally, acting locally”: Municipal labour and socialist activism in comparative perspective, 1890-1920’, Labour History Review, vol.74, no.3, December2009, p.234. Google Scholar

98.Ibid., p.250. Google Scholar

99.F. Shor, ‘Left labor agitators in the Pacifi c Rim of the early twentieth century’, International Labor and Working Class History, no.67, Spring2005, pp.148-63. Google Scholar

100.J. Merritt, The Making of the AWU,Oxford University Press,, 1986, p.206. Google Scholar

101.R.P. Davis, ‘“A real and quite unique affinity”: New Zealand and Tasmanian Labor, 1934-49’, Labour History, no.40, May1981, pp.68-76. Google Scholar

102.R. Frances andB. Scates, ‘Introduction’, in Frances and Scates, Women, Work and the Labour Movement in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand, p.x. Google Scholar

103.B. Scates, ‘Gender, household and community politics: the 1890 maritime strike in Australia and New Zealand’, in Frances and Scates, Women, Work and the Labour Movement in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand, pp.70-87. Google Scholar

104.Bennett, ‘Rats and Revolutionaries’, p.9. Google Scholar

105.N. Balnave andGreg Patmore, ‘“Practical utopians”: Rochdale consumer cooperatives in Australia and New Zealand’, Labour History, no.95, November2008, pp.97-111;S. Harford, ‘A Trans-Tasman union community: Growing global solidarity’, Labour History, no.95, November2008, pp.133-50. Google Scholar

106.I. MacPherson ‘Co-operative studies in Australia and beyond’, Labour History, no.91, November2006, pp.69-74. Google Scholar

107.R. O’Malley, ‘The eclipse of mateship: The wide comb dispute 1979-85’, Labour History, no.90, May2006, pp.155-76. Google Scholar

108.Hearn andKnowles, One Big Union, pp.29, 67-68, 128;Merritt, Making of the AWU, pp.38, 96, 102, 173, 185, 195, 210, 214, 218, 244-45, 349. Google Scholar

109.E. Ross, A History of the Miners’ Federation of Australia,Australasian Coal and Shale Employees’ Federation,, 1970, pp.189-90, 239-40, 245, 298-99. Google Scholar

110.K. Buckley, The Amalgamated Engineers in Australia, 1852-1920,ANU,, 1970, pp.76-88, 247-48, 252. Google Scholar

111.For example, theAustralasian Meat Industry Employees’ Union. Google Scholar

112.B. Fitzpatrick andR. Cahill, The Seamen’s Union of Australia, 1872-1972: A History,Seamen’s Union of Australia,, 1981, pp.8-9, 140, 164, 249, 294. Google Scholar

113.H. Goodall, ‘Port politics: Indian seamen, Australian unions and Indonesian independence, 1945-47’, Labour History, no.94, May2008, pp.43-68. Google Scholar

114.B. Penrose, ‘Occupational lead poisoning in battery workers: The failure to apply the precautionary principle’, Labour History, no.84, May2003, pp.1-20. Google Scholar

115.A. Whitehead, Paradise Mislaid: In Search of the Australian Tribe of Paraguay,University of Queensland Press,, 1997;G. Souter, A Peculiar People: The Australians in Paraguay,Sydney University Press,, 1981(originally publishedAngus and Robertson, 1968). Google Scholar

116.R. Harris, ‘The suburban worker in the history of labor’, International Labor and Working Class History, no.64, Fall2003, pp.8-24. Google Scholar

117.M. van der Linden, ‘The importance of Anti-Labour history’, Labour History, no.89, November2005, pp.121-23. Google Scholar

118.Hobsbawm, ‘What is the workers’ country?’, p.49. Google Scholar

119.L. Taksa, ‘What’s in a name? Labouring antipodean history in Oceania’, inJ. Lucassen, Global Labour History: A State of the Art,Peter Lang,, 2006, pp.335-71;M. Nolan, ‘Pacific currents in the Tasman: Comparative and transnational perspectives on New Zealand labour history’, Labour History, no.88, May2005, pp.233-42. Google Scholar

120.M. van der Linden, ‘Labour history: An international movement’, pp.229-31;M. van der Linden, ‘The “globalization” of labour and working-class history and its consequences’, International Labor and Working Class History, no.65, Spring2004, pp.143-45. Google Scholar

121.For example,Bill Robbins, ‘Governor Macquarie’s job descriptions and the bureaucratic control of the convict labour process’, Labour History, no.96, May2009, pp.1-18;W.M. Robbins, ‘The lumber yards: a case study in the management of convict labour 1788-1832’, Labour History, no.79, November2000, pp.141-61;H. McQueen, ‘Convicts and rebels’, Labour History, no.15, November1968, pp.3-30;R. Castle andJ. Hagan, ‘Regulation of Aboriginal labour in Queensland: Protectors, agreements and trust accounts 1897-1965’, Labour History, no.72, May1997, pp.66-76;J. Martinez, ‘The end of indenture? Asian workers in the Australian pearling industry, 1901-1972’, International Labour and Working Class History, Vol67, 2005, pp.125-47. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Markey, Raymond