Labour History

Completing the Order’s History Down Under: The Knights of Labor in Australia

Labour History (2016), 110, (1), 1–18.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5263/labourhistory.110.0001
Language
English
Pages
18

Abstract

The rise and fall of an American movement, the Noble and Holy Order of the Knights of Labor, in the Australian colonies between the 1880s and the 1900s is a neglected chapter in labour history. This unusual movement, at once a fraternal order, trade union, political grouping and co-operative enterprise, became the first truly national organisation of American workers. The Knights also became a global movement with branches in England, Wales, Ireland, Scotland, France, Belgium, South Africa, New Zealand and Australia. Scholars have explored the parameters of the Order’s North American history in great detail. They have not given anywhere near the same level of scrutiny to the Order’s history in other parts of the world, however, and this discrepancy is particularly striking when it comes to their branches in Australia. Australian labour historians have never neglected the American ideas, individuals and institutions that helped to shape the early history of the Australian labour movement. Henry George, Edward Bellamy, Laurence Gronlund, Daniel De Leon and the Industrial Workers of the World, amongst others, all have major studies devoted to their activities and influence in Australia. The Australian Knights of Labor, by contrast, have been the subject of only several pages in a small selection of books and articles. This article provides their future historian with the necessary material to fill this gap in the scholarship and mount a proper study of their history. It provides a narrative of their activities in the various Australian colonies, so far as we can ascertain them, and draws attention to the many holes and unclear parts of that narrative. It then provides a series of questions to inform future research into the Australian Knights, compares with them with the histories of Knights in other non-American countries, and connects them to wider fields of historical scholarship, including imperial and global labour history. This article is, in other words, the first sustained study of the Australian Knights of Labor; it also provides the foundation from which a larger study might hopefully come.

Access Token

FormatArticle

£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
References
Full Text
PDF
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Footnotes

*The author would like to thankLabour History’stwo anonymous referees for their very helpful suggestions, and Elizabeth Wiedenheft for reading earlier drafts of this article. Google Scholar

1.Robert Weir, Knights Down Under: The Knights of Labour in New Zealand(:Cambridge Scholars Press, 2009), 205–206. Google Scholar

2.Knights of Labor, Adelphon Kruptos(:Knights of Labor, 1886), 13. Google Scholar

3.For attempts to bring these histories together, seeWeir, Knights Down Under, ch. 6;Steven Parfitt, “The First-and-a-Half International: The Knights of Labor and the History of International Labour Organizations in the Nineteenth Century,” Labour History Review 80, no. 2(2015):135–67. Google Scholar

4.SeeLeon Watillon, The Knights of Labor in Belgium(:Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, 1959);Henry Pelling, “The Knights of Labor in Britain, 1880–1901,” The Economic History Review 9, no. 2(1956):313–39. Google Scholar

5.Weir, Knights Down Under. Google Scholar

6.Lloyd Churchward, “The American Influence on the Australian Labor Movement,” Historical Studies: Australia and New Zealand 5(1952):258–77. Google Scholar

7.Bruce Scates, “‘Millenium or Pandemonium?’ Radicalism in the Labour Movement, Sydney, 1889–1899,” Labour History, no. 50(May1986):72–94;Bruce Scates, “‘Wobblers’: Single Taxers in the Labour Movement, Melbourne 1889–1899,” Historical Studies 21, no. 83(1984):174–96;Bruce Scates, A New Australia: Citizenship, Radicalism and the First Republic(:Cambridge University Press, 1997). Google Scholar

8.Verity Burgmann, “In Our Time”: Socialism and the Rise of Labor, 1885–1905(:George Allen & Unwin, 1985). Google Scholar

9.Bob James, “The Knights of Labor and Their Context,” Radical Tradition, accessed April2016,www.takver.com/history/secsoc02.htm. Google Scholar

10.Weir, Knights Down Under, 227–32. Google Scholar

11. Ibid., 227. Google Scholar

12.For Engels:“Preface to the American Edition,”inFrederick Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England(, 1887), Marxists Internet Archive, accessed April 2016,https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1887/01/26.htm. For Guesde:J. H. M. Laslett, “Haymarket, Henry George, and the Labor Upsurge in Britain and America during the Late 1880s,” International Labor and Working-Class History 29(1986):69. For Marx:Eleanor Marx andEdward Aveling, The Working-Class Movement in America(:Swan Sonnenscheib & Co., 1891), Marxists Internet Archive, accessed April 2016,https://www.marxists.org/archive/eleanor-marx/works/wcia.htm. Google Scholar

13. Hobart Mercury, 20 April1886. Google Scholar

14.Greg Patmore, Australian Labour History(:Longman Cheshire, 1991), 64. Google Scholar

15.Ben Maddison, “‘The Day of the Just Reasoner’: T. A. Coghlan and the Labour Public Sphere in Late Nineteenth Century Australia,” Labour History, no. 77(November1999):15. Google Scholar

16.Ray Markey, “New Unionism in Australia, 1880–1900,” Labour History, no. 48(May1995):15. Google Scholar

17.Robin Gollan, Radical and Working Class Politics: A Study of Eastern Australia, 1850–1910(:Melbourne University Press, 1960), 104. Google Scholar

18.Maddison, “The Day of the Just Reasoner,” 15. Google Scholar

19.Ken Buckley andTed Wheelwright, No Paradise for Workers: Capitalism and the Common People in Australia, 1788–1914(:Oxford University Press, 1988), 177. Google Scholar

20.Race Matthews, Australia’s First Fabians: Middle-Class Radicals, Labour Activists, and the Early Labour Movement(:Cambridge University Press, 1993);James Bennett, Rats and Revolutionaries: The Labour Movement in Australia and New Zealand, 1890–1940(:University of Otago Press, 2004), 20. Google Scholar

21.Churchward, “American Influence,” 258–63. Google Scholar

22.Gollan, Radical and Working Class Politics, 121. Google Scholar

23.Peter Love, Labour and the Money Power: Australian Labour Populism, 1890–1950(:Melbourne University Press, 1984), 10. Google Scholar

24.Robin Archer, Why is There No Labor Party in the United States?(:Princeton University Press, 2007), 214. Google Scholar

25.Ray Markey, “Populism and the Formation of a Labour Party in New South Wales, 1890–1900,” Journal of Australian Studies 11, no. 20(1987):38–48;Frank Bongiorno, “Class, Populism and Labour Politics in Victoria, 1890–1914,” Labour History, no. 66(May1994):14–32. Google Scholar

26.Bongiorno, “Class, Populism and Labour Politics,” 17. Google Scholar

27.The classic statement of this idea remains David Montgomery, “Labor and the Republic in Industrial America, 1860–1920,” Le Mouvement Social 111(1980):201–15. Google Scholar

28.Churchward, “American Influence,” 265. Google Scholar

29.John Kellett, “William Lane and New Australia: A Reassessment,” Labour History, no. 72(May1997):2. Google Scholar

30.Weir, Knights Down Under, 227. Google Scholar

31.W. Lane toPowderly, 12 May 1886, box 21, Terence V Powderly Papers, Catholic University of America. Google Scholar

32. Brisbane Courier, 28 May1887. Google Scholar

33. Ibid., 5 September1887. Google Scholar

34.Archer, Why is There No Labor Party, 34. Google Scholar

35. Brisbane Courier, 12 October1889. Google Scholar

36.Robin Walker, “The Maritime Strikes in South Australia, 1887 and 1890,” Labour History, no. 14(March1968):3;Jim Moss, Sound of Trumpets: History of the Labour Movement in South Australia(:Wakefield Press, 1985), 122. Google Scholar

37.Scates, A New Australia, 149. Google Scholar

38.Moss, Sound of Trumpets, 119. Google Scholar

39. South Australian Advertiser, 10 February1887. Google Scholar

40. South Australian Advertiser, 24 February1887. Google Scholar

41.Weir, Knights Down Under, 1–2, 7–10. Google Scholar

42. Los Angeles Times, 31 May1888. Google Scholar

43.Weir, Knights Down Under, 227. Google Scholar

44. Omaha Daily Bee, 16 August1889;Raleigh News and Observer, 23 July1889. Google Scholar

45. Brisbane Courier, 12 October1889. Google Scholar

46.Weir, Knights Down Under, 228. Google Scholar

47.Scates, “Millenium or Pandemonium,” 76. Google Scholar

48.Jonathan Garlock, Guide to the Local Assemblies of the Knights of Labor(:Greenwood, 1982), 579. Google Scholar

49.Scates, “Wobblers,” 180. Google Scholar

50.Weir, Knights Down Under, 227–28;Scates, “Millenium or Pandemonium,” 76. Google Scholar

51.Scates, “Wobblers,” 176. Google Scholar

52. Birmingham Daily Post, 30 January1891. Google Scholar

53.Susan Levine, Labor’s True Woman: Carpet Weavers, Industrialization and Labor Reform in the Gilded Age(:Temple University Press, 1984), esp. 105–21. Google Scholar

54.Scates, A New Australia, 81. Google Scholar

55. Ibid., 149–54;Churchward, “American Influence,” 266. Google Scholar

56.See, for instance, Footscray Independent, 3 February1894;Melbourne Argus, 11 July1891and 15 April1893. Google Scholar

57.See, for instance, Footscray Independent, 9 July1898;Weir, Knights Down Under, 232. Google Scholar

58.Weir, Knights Down Under, 229. Google Scholar

59.Powderly to Donald Fraser, 17 January1891, box 103, Terence V Powderly Papers, Catholic University of America. Google Scholar

60. Clinch Valley News, 23 September1892. Google Scholar

61.Weir, Knights Down Under, 231. Google Scholar

62.Scates, “Millenium or Pandemonium,” 82–83. Google Scholar

63. Melbourne Argus, 11 July1891and 15 April1893;Churchward, “American Influence,” 264. Google Scholar

64.Scates, “Wobblers,” 181. Google Scholar

65.Gollan, Radical and Working Class Politics, 141. Google Scholar

66.Weir, Knights Down Under, 229;Footscray Independent, 2 December1893. Google Scholar

67.Churchward, “American Influence,” 265–66;Leon Fink, Workingmen’s Democracy: The Knights of Labor and American Politics(:University of Illinois Press, 1983). Google Scholar

68.Archer, Why is There No Labor Party, 40. Google Scholar

69.Churchward, “American Influence,” 266. Google Scholar

70.Weir, Knights Down Under, 228. Google Scholar

71. Ibid., 229;Proceedings of the General Assembly of the Knights of Labor(:Knights of Labor, 1898), 4, 49. Google Scholar

72. Kalgoorlie Western Argus, 13 April1899. Google Scholar

73.Burgmann, In Our Time, 164. Google Scholar

74.Bob James reproduces photos with Dr William Moloney and other Knight in this regalia at the turn of the century;James, “Knights of Labor and Their Context”. Google Scholar

75.Weir, Knights Down Under, 229–30. Google Scholar

76. Barrier Miner, 2 May1904. Google Scholar

77.See, for instance,Ray Markey, “The Australian Place in Comparative Labour History,” Labour History, no. 100(May2011):167–88. Google Scholar

78.For the Canadian case see the joint issue ofLabour/Le Travail 38(1996) andLabour History, no. 71(November1996). Google Scholar

79.Watillon, The Knights of Labor in Belgium, 13, 25. Google Scholar

80.For the South African Knights, seeJack Simons andRay Simons, Class and Colour in South Africa, 1850–1950(:Penguin, 1969);Robert Vicat Turrell, Capital and Labour on the Kimberley Diamond Fields, 1871–1890(:Cambridge University Press, 1987). Google Scholar

81.Weir, Knights Down Under, 227. Google Scholar

82. Ibid., 229. Google Scholar

83.For a summary of trans-Tasman labour history see, for instance, the introduction toBennett, Rats and Revolutionaries;Raelene Frances andMelanie Nolan, “Gender and the Trans-Tasman World of Labour: Transnational and Comparative Histories,” Labour History, no. 95(November2008):25–42. Google Scholar

84.See, for instance,Marcel van der Linden, Transnational Labour History: Explorations(:Ashgate, 2000);Jan Lucassen, ed., Global Labour History: A State of the Art(:Peter Lang, 2006). Google Scholar

85.Gary G. Magee andAndrew S. Thompson, Empire and Globalisation: Networks of People, Goods and Capital in the British World, c.1850–1914(:Cambridge University Press, 2010). Google Scholar

86.For one explanation of this process, especially as it relates to working-class internationalism at the end of the nineteenth century, seeMarcel van der Linden, “The Rise and Fall of the First International: An Interpretation,”inInternationalism in the Labour Movement, 1830–1940, volume 1, ed.F. van Holthoon andMarcel van der Linden(:Brill, 1988), 323–35. Google Scholar

87.Steven Parfitt, Knights across the Atlantic: The Knights of Labor in Britain and Ireland(:Liverpool University of Press, forthcoming2016). Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Parfitt, Steven