International Development Planning Review

Informal settlement is not a euphemism for ‘slum’: what’s at stake beyond the language?

International Development Planning Review (2021), 43, (2), 139–150.

Abstract

Everybody knows that the phrase ‘informal settlement’ is a widely used euphemism for ‘slum’, avoiding a word that can be seen to cast a stigma on neighbourhoods of the urban poor. Yet we have also long known that ‘informal settlement’ is a verb - identifying self-organised modes of production through which the urban poor produce affordable housing and urban infrastructure. Here we argue four key points. First, the distinction between slums and informal settlement is evident in UN-Habitat data that suggests that informal settlement has rapidly expanded while slums have not. Second, informality is a paradoxical condition that can be identified with the illegality, insecurity and inferiority of the slum, but also with the incremental self-organisation of urban commoning and the right to the city. Third, while the language of the ‘slum’ will inevitably persist, the UN-Habitat definition is both too broad and too narrow - conflating material conditions with overcrowding and tenure insecurity while excluding overdevelopment. Finally, if we want to understand ‘informal settlement’ as a dominant mode of urban production then we need to stop using it interchangeably with the term ‘slum’ and engage with how it works as the design and planning of housing and urban infrastructure.

Access Token
£25.00
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

Abrams, C. (1964) Man’s Struggle for Shelter in an Urbanizing World, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. Google Scholar

Appadurai, A. (2000) ‘Spectral housing and urban cleansing’, Public Culture, 13(3), 627-651. Google Scholar

Bayat, A. (1997) Street Politics, New York, Columbia University Press. Google Scholar

Braudel, F. (1979) Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century, New York, Harper and Row. Google Scholar

Davis, M. (2006) Planet of Slums, London, Verso. Google Scholar

de Castro Mazarro, A. (2018) ‘Slums: disassembling the concept’, ARQ (Santiago), 98, 80-91. Google Scholar

Dovey, K. and Kamalipour, H. (2018) ‘Informal/formal morphologies’, in K. Dovey, E. Pafka and M. Ristic (eds), Mapping Urbanities, New York, Routledge, 223-248. Google Scholar

Dovey, K. and Pafka, E. (2014) ‘The urban density assemblage’, Urban Design International, 19(1), 66-76. Google Scholar

Friesen, J., Taubenböck, H., Wurm, M. and Pelz, P. (2018) ‘The similar size of slums’, Habitat International, 73, 79-88. Google Scholar

Gilbert, A. (2007) ‘The return of the slum: does language matter?’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), 697-713. Google Scholar

Gilbert, A. (2009) ‘Extreme thinking about slums and slum dwellers’, SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(1), 35-48. Google Scholar

Hakim, B. (2014) Mediterranean Urbanism, Dordrecht, Springer. Google Scholar

Huchzermeyer, M. (2014) ‘Troubling continuities’, in S. Parnell and S. Oldfield (eds), The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, London, Routledge, 86-97. Google Scholar

Kohli, D., Sliuzas, R., Kerle, N. and Stein, A. (2012) ‘An ontology of slums for image-based classification’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(2), 154-163. Google Scholar

Kuffer, M., Pfeffer, K. and Sliuzas, R. (2016) ‘Slums from space: 15 years of slum mapping using remote sensing’, Remote Sensing, 8(6), 455. Google Scholar

Mahabir, R., Croitoru, A., Crooks, A., Agouris, P. and Stefanidis, A. (2018) ‘A critical review of high and very high-resolution remote sensing approaches for detecting and mapping slums’, Urban Science, 2(1), 8. Google Scholar

Mangin, W. (1967) ‘Latin American squatter settlements’, Latin American Research Review, 2(3), 65-98. Google Scholar

Mayne, A. (2017) Slums: The History of a Global Injustice, London, Reaktion. Google Scholar

Meth, P. (2013) ‘Millenium development goals and urban informal settlements’, International Development Planning Review, 35(1), v-xiii. Google Scholar

Moser, C. (1979) ‘Informal sector or petty commodity production’, in R. Bromley (ed.), The Urban Informal Sector, Oxford, Pergamon, 1041-1064. Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons, New York, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

Rao, V. (2006) ‘Slum as theory’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 225-232. Google Scholar

Roy, A. (2005) ‘Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147-158. Google Scholar

Scott, J. (1985) Weapons of the Weak, New Haven, Yale University Press. Google Scholar

Taubenböck, H. and Kraff, N. (2014) ‘The physical face of slums’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(1), 15-38. Google Scholar

Turner, J. (1972) ‘Housing as a verb’, in J. Turner and R. Fichter (eds), Freedom to Build, New York, Macmillan, 148-175. Google Scholar

UN-Habitat (2003) The Challenge of Slums, London, Earthscan. Google Scholar

UN-Habitat (2006) State of the World’s Cities 2006/7, London, Earthscan. Google Scholar

UN-Habitat (2016a) Slum Almanac 2015-16, UN-Habitat, Nairobi. Google Scholar

UN-Habitat (2016b) World Cities Full Report 2016, UN-Habitat, Nairobi. Google Scholar

Wallerstein, I. (1991) ‘Braudel on capitalism, or everything upside down’, Journal of Modern History, 63(2), 354-361. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Dovey, Kim

Shafique, Tanzil

van Oostrum, Matthijs

Chatterjee, Ishita