Romani Studies

Attitudinal ambivalence towards the Romanian Roma: A comparison between Italian and French students

Romani Studies (2021), 31, (1), 77–99.

Abstract

Recent migrations of East European Roma have exacerbated the currently widespread phenomenon of antiziganism in Europe, but there are cultural, social, political, and historical factors in the various European countries that may affect reactions to Roma in diverse ways. This study aims to compare the attitudes of two groups of 198 young Italian and French people towards Romanian Roma. Stereotypical representations, affective reactions, and levels of cognitive and affective ambivalence were assessed. The results showed a univalent prejudice even if the attitudes of the Italian participants were more unfavourable than those expressed by their French peers. The data showed a similar stereotypical image of the outgroup but different intensities in the affective variables assessed. Italian and French participants were cognitively but not affectively ambivalent towards the Romanian Roma, and the difference between the two levels of cognitive ambivalence was not statistically significant. Potential social factors, such as the history of migration or the political agenda setting, are hypothesized as the origin of the differences in the intensities of Italian and French participants’ feelings towards the Romanian Roma.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

Agoni, Marianna. 2016. Etnografia delle migrazioni e degli spostamenti di alcune famiglie di rom romeni tra Grădina e Milano. In: Pontrandolfo, Stefania, and Piasere, Leonardo, eds. Italia Romaní. Le migrazioni dei rom romeni in Italia. Firenze: CISU. 141-58. Google Scholar

Albarello, Flavia, and Rubini, Monica. 2011. Outgroup projection: Il caso degli stereotipi negativi attribuiti a Rom e Rumeni. Psicologia Sociale 6 (3): 355-66. Google Scholar

Armitage, Christopher J., and Conner, Mark. 2000. Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (11): 1421-32. Google Scholar

Arrigoni, Paola, and Vitale, Tommaso. 2008. Quale legalità? Rom e gagi a confronto. Aggiornamento Sociale 3: 182-94. Google Scholar

Asséo, Henriette. 2010. Figures bohémiennes et fiction, l’âge des possibles 1770-920. Le Temps des médias 2010/1 (14): 12-27. Google Scholar

Benarrosh-Orsoni, Norah. 2019. La maison double. Lieux, routes et objets d’une migration rom. Nanterre: Société d’ethnologie. Google Scholar

Berti, Chiara, Pivetti, Monica, and Di Battista, Silvia. 2013. The ontologization of Romani: An Italian study on the cross-categorization approach. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 37 (4): 405-14. Google Scholar

Brown, Rupert. 1995. Prejudice. Its social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar

Cacciaguerra, Francesco. 1994. Il contagio razzista nei figli. Troina: Oasi. Google Scholar

Cernat, Vasile. 2011. Extended contact effects: Is exposure to positive outgroup exemplars sufficient or is interaction with ingroup members necessary? The Journal of Social Psychology 151 (6): 737-53. Google Scholar

Cingolani, Pietro, Picker, Giovani, and Tesar, Catalina. 2011. (Rom)eni tra Italia e territori di partenza. Vita quotidiana, rappresentazione e politiche pubbliche. FIERI rapporti di ricerca. http://fieri.it/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Romeni-tra-italia-e-territori-di-partenza.pdf, accessed 23 April 2020. Google Scholar

Costarelli, Sandro. 1999. L’immagine sociale degli zingari: un’indagine transnazionale. In: Piasere Leonardo, ed. Italia Romaní. Roma: CISU. 23-33. Google Scholar

Costarelli, Sandro. 2011. Seeming ambivalent, being prejudiced: The moderating role of attitude basis on experienced affect. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 15 (1): 49-59. Google Scholar

Costarelli, Sandro, and Gerłowska, Justyna. 2015a. I am not prejudiced towards “them” … I am ambivalent! The moderating roles of attitudinal basis and motivation to respond without prejudice. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 19 (1): 1-14. Google Scholar

Costarelli, Sandro, and Gerłowska, Justyna. 2015b. Ambivalence, prejudice and negative behavioural tendencies towards outgroups: The moderating role of attitude basis. Cognition and Emotion 29 (5): 852-66. Google Scholar

Cottaar, Annemarie, Lucassen, Leo, and Willems, Wim. 1998. Gypsies and other itinerant groups. A socio-historical approach. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Google Scholar

Cottrell, Catherine A., and Neuberg, Steven L. 2005. Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (5): 770-89. Google Scholar

Cousin, Grégoire. 2009. “Rroms migrants.” Espaces Temps.net. 8 April. https://www.espacestemps.net/articles/rroms-migrants/, accessed 20 January 2019. Google Scholar

Cousin, Grégoire. 2011. L’émergence en Italie d’une “politique tzigane” face aux mobilités roumaines à la fin des années 2000. Etudes Tsiganes 46: 28-45. Google Scholar

Cousin, Grégoire. 2017. Life and death of a French shantytown. An anthropology of power. In: Matras, Yaron, and Leggio, Viktor Daniele, eds. Open borders, unlocked cultures. Romanian Roma migrants in Western Europe. Oxon, New York: Routledge. 130-50. Google Scholar

Cousin, Grégoire, Bianchi, Federico, and Vitale, Tommaso. 2020. From Roma autochthonous homophily to socialization and community building in the Paris metropolitan region shantytowns. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1736993, accessed 23 April 2020. Google Scholar

Crandall, Christian S., and Eshleman, Amy. 2003. A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin 129 (3): 414-16. Google Scholar

De Oliveira, Pierre, and Dambrun, Michaël. 2007. Maintaining the status quo and social inequalities: Is stereotype endorsement related to support for system justification? Current Research in Social Psychology 13 (9): 101-21. Google Scholar

Delépine, Samuel. 2014. Des politiques publiques à l’égard des Roms: Hier comme aujourd’hui une catégorisation négative. In: Coquio, Catherine, and Poueyto, Jean-Luc, eds. “Roms,” “Tsiganes,” “Nomades”: Un malentendu européen. Paris: Karthala. 397-417. Google Scholar

Dijker, Anton J, Koomen, Willem, Heuvel, Henriëtte, and Frijda, Nico H. 1996. Perceived antecedents of emotional reactions in inter-ethnic relations. British Journal of Social Psychology 35 (2): 313-29. Google Scholar

Drydakis, Nick. 2012. Roma women in Athenian firms: Do they face wage bias? Ethnic and Racial Studies 35 (12): 2054-74. Google Scholar

Enesco, Ileana, Navarro, Alejandra, Paradela, Isabel, and Guerrero, Silvia. 2005. Stereotypes and beliefs about different ethnic groups in Spain. A study with Spanish and Latin American children living in Madrid. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 26 (6): 638-59. Google Scholar

Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J.C., Glick, Peter, and Xu, Jun. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (6): 878-902. Google Scholar

Fleming, Monique A., Petty, Richard E., and White, Paul H. 2005. Stigmatized targets and evaluation: Prejudice as a determinant of attribute scrutiny and polarization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (4): 496-507. Google Scholar

Fontanella, Lara, Villano, Paola, and Di Donato, Marika. 2016. Attitudes towards Roma people and migrants: A comparison through a Bayesian multidimensional IRT model. Quality and Quantity 50 (2): 471-90. Google Scholar

Gómez-Berrocal, Carmen, and Navas, Marisol. 2000. Predictores del prejuicio manifiesto y sutil hacia los gitanos. Revista de Psicología Social 15 (1): 3-30. Google Scholar

Goodman, Simon, and Rowe, Lottie. 2014. “Maybe it is prejudice … but it is NOT racism”: Negotiating racism in discussion forums about Gypsies. Discourse and Society 25 (1): 32-46. Google Scholar

Hnilica, Karel, and Radová, Lia. 2013. Rasismus? Postoje? Ideologie? K determinantám etnických stereotypů. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie 57 (2): 144-61. Google Scholar

Hodson, Gordon, Maio, Gregory R., and Esses, Victoria M. 2001. The role of attitudinal ambivalence in susceptibility to consensus information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 23 (3): 197-205. Google Scholar

Jost, John T., and Kay, Aaron C. 2005. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (3): 498-509. Google Scholar

Katz, Irwin, and Glass, David C. 1979. An ambivalence-amplification theory of behavior toward the stigmatized. In: Worchel, Stephen, and Austin, William, eds. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. 55-70. Google Scholar

Katz, Irwin, and Hass, Glen. 1988. Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (6): 893-905. Google Scholar

Legros, Olivier, and Rossetto, Jean. 2011. La “question rom” en Europe aujourd’hui: Regards croisés et mises en perspectives. Études Tsiganes 46: 4-25. Google Scholar

Legros, Olivier, and Vitale, Tommaso. 2011. Les migrants roms dans les villes françaises et italiennes : mobilités, régulations et marginalités. Géocarrefour 86 (1): 3-14. Google Scholar

Lièvre, Marion. 2016. Roms roumanisés, Ciurari, Ursari: ethnicité et appartenances sociales. Ethnographie des migrants roms roumains à Montpellier. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales 32 (1): 35-57. Google Scholar

Ljujic, Vanja, Vedder, Paul, Dekker, Henk, and van Geel, Mitch. 2012. Romaphobia: A unique phenomenon? Romani Studies 22 (2): 141-52. Google Scholar

Ljujic, Vanja, Vedder, Paul, Dekker, Henk, and Geel, Mitch. 2013. Romaphobia among Serbian and Dutch adolescents: The role of perceived threat, nationalistic feelings, and integrative orientations. International Journal of Psychology 48 (3): 352-62. Google Scholar

MacDonald, Tara K., and Zanna, Mark P. 1998. Cross-dimension ambivalence toward social groups: Can ambivalence affect intentions to hire feminists? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (4): 427-41. Google Scholar

Mackie, Diane M., and Smith, Eliot R. 1998. Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review 105 (3): 499-529. Google Scholar

Mackie, Diane M., Devos, Thierry, and Smith, Eliot R. 2000. Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (4): 602-16. Google Scholar

Marcu, Afrodita, and Chryssochoou, Xenia. 2005. Exclusion of ethnic groups from the realm of humanity: Prejudice against the Gypsies in Britain and in Romania. Psicologia Politica 30: 41-56. Google Scholar

Martínez, Rocío, Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa, and Moya, Miguel. 2012. Are they animals or machines? Measuring dehumanization. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 15 (3): 1110-22. Google Scholar

Marushiakova, Elena, and Popov, Veselin. 2006. De l’Est à l’Ouest, Chronologie et typologie des migrations tsiganes en Europe. Études Tsiganes 27-28: 10-25. Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron, and Leggio, Daniele Viktor. 2018. Open borders, unlocked cultures. Romanian Roma migrants in Western Europe. Abingdon; New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

Mayall, David. 2004. Gypsy identities, 1500-2000. From Egipcyans and Moon-men to the ethnic Romany. London: Routledge. Google Scholar

McConahay, John B. 1986. Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In: Dovidio, John, and Gaertner, Samuel, eds. Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. San Diego, CA: US Academic Press. 91-125. Google Scholar

McConahay, John B., Hardee, Betty B., and Batts, Valerie. 1981. Has racism declined in America? It depends on who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution 25 (4): 563-79. Google Scholar

Monaci, Maria Grazia, and Trentin, Rosanna. 2008. Gli alunni Rom/Sinti nella scuola media: Effetti del contatto sull’atteggiamento etnico nelle classi multiculturali. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 35 (4): 933-60. Google Scholar

Moscovici, Serge. 2011. An essay on social representations and ethnic minorities. Social Science Information 50 (3-4): 442-61. Google Scholar

Mucchi-Faina, Angelica, Costarelli, Sandro, and Romoli, Chiara. 2002. The effects of intergroup context of evaluation on ambivalence toward the ingroup and the outgroup. European Journal of Social Psychology 32 (2): 247-59. Google Scholar

Ng, Andy H., Hynie, Michaela, and MacDonald, Tara K. 2012. Culture moderates the pliability of ambivalent attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43 (8): 1313-24. Google Scholar

Nicolae, Valeriu. 2007. Towards a definition of anti-Gypsyism. In: Slavik, Hannah, and Nicolae, Valeriu, eds. Roma diplomacy. New York: The International Debate Education Association. 21-30. Google Scholar

Olivera, Martin. 2009. Introduction aux formes et raisons de la diversité rom roumaine. Etudes Tsiganes 38: 10-40. Google Scholar

Olivera, Martin. 2011. Roms en (bidon)villes. Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm. Google Scholar

Pacilli, Maria Giuseppina, Mucchi-Faina, Angelica, Pagliaro, Stefano, Mirisola, Alberto, and Alparone, Francesca Romana. 2013. When affective (but not cognitive) ambivalence predicts discrimination toward a minority group. The Journal of Social Psychology 153 (1): 10-24. Google Scholar

Pérez, Juan A., Moscovici, Serge, and Chulvi, Berta. 2007. The taboo against group contact: Hypothesis of Gypsy ontologization. British Journal of Social Psychology 46 (2): 249-72. Google Scholar

Petty, Richard E., Fleming, Monique A., and White, Paul H. 1999. Stigmatized sources and persuasion: Prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1): 19-34. Google Scholar

Piasere, Leonardo. 2012a. Scenari dell’antiziganismo. Tra Europa e Italia, tra antropologia e politica. Firenze: SEID. Google Scholar

Piasere, Leonardo. 2012b. Che cos’è l’antiziganismo? Antropologia e Teatro 3: 126-48. Google Scholar

Piasere, Leonardo. 2015. L’antiziganismo. Macerata: Quodlibet. Google Scholar

Pivetti, Monica, Melotti, Giannino, and Bonomo, Mariana. 2017. An exploration of social representations of the Roma woman in Italy and Brazil: Psychosocial anchoring to emotional reactions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 58: 12-22. Google Scholar

Pontrandolfo, Stefania. 2014. The disappearance of a Rom community and the rejection of the politics of recognition. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 19 (2): 119-31. Google Scholar

Pontrandolfo, Stefania, and Piasere, Leonardo, eds. 2016. Italia Romaní. Le migrazioni dei rom romeni in Italia. Firenze: CISU Google Scholar

Potot, Swanie. 2018. Nous les Roms, ou les Tsiganes comme vous dites vous… Catégorisations ethniques et frontières sociales en Europe. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes. Google Scholar

Reyniers, Alain. 1995. Les populations tsiganes et leurs mouvements dans les pays d’Europe centrale et orientale et vers quelques pays de l’OCDE. Paris: OCDE. Google Scholar

Saul, Nicholas, and Tebbutt, Susan, eds. 2004. The role of the Romanies. Images and counter-images of “Gypsies”-Romanies in European cultures. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar

Sigona, Nando. 2002. Figli del ghetto: Gli italiani, i campi nomadi e l’invenzione degli zingari. Seregnano di Civezzano: Nonluoghi Libere Edizioni. Google Scholar

Stephan, Walter G., Diaz-Loving, Rolando, and Duran, Anne. 2000. Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 31 (2): 240-9. Google Scholar

Thompson, Megan M., Zanna, Mark P., and Griffin, Dale W. 1995. Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In: Petty, Richard E., and Krosnick Jon A., eds. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequence. New York: Psychology Press. 361-86. Google Scholar

Tileagă, Cristian. 2006. Representing the “other”: A discursive analysis of prejudice and moral exclusion in talk about Romanies. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 16 (1): 19-41. Google Scholar

Tosi Cambini, Sabrina. 2016. Da un villagio del sud della Romania a una città del centro Italia. Alcuni elementi di riflessione intorno al tempo, allo spazio e al senso nella migrazione di una rete di famiglie di rudari. In: Pontrandolfo, Stefania, and Piasere, Leonardo, eds. Italia Romaní. Le migrazioni dei rom romeni in Italia. Firenze: CISU. 159-84. Google Scholar

Trentin, Rosanna, Monaci, Maria Grazia, Gradella, Nicoletta, and Cei, Barbara. 2000. Reazioni emotive e pregiudizio verso gli zingari dei loro compagni di scuola italiani. Orientamenti Pedagogici 47 (277): 114-36. Google Scholar

Van Selm, Martine, and Jankowski, Nicholas W. 2006. Conducting online surveys. Quality and Quantity 40 (3): 435-56. Google Scholar

Villano, Paola, Fontanella, Lara, Fontanella, Sara, and Di Donato, Marika. 2017. Stereotyping Roma people in Italy: IRT models for ambivalent prejudice measurement. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 57: 30-41. Google Scholar

Vitale, Tommaso, and Michelat, Guy. 2016. Romaphobie et anti-tsiganisme en France, 2016: Des sentiments plus nuancés envers les Roms. In: Commission nationale consultative des droits de l’homme, ed. La lutte contre le racisme, l’antisémitisme et la xénophobie Année 2015. Paris: La documentation Française. 339-55. Google Scholar

Wright, Stephen C., Aron, Arthur, McLaughlin-Volpe, Tracy, and Ropp, Stacy A. 1997. The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (1): 73-90. Google Scholar

Zick, Andreas, Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Wagner, Ulrich. 2008. Ethnic prejudice and discrimination in Europe. Journal of Social Issues 64 (2): 233-51. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

COUSIN, GRÉGOIRE

FATTORI, FRANCESCO

MENEGHINI, ANNA MARIA