International Development Planning Review

The limits of insulation: the long-term political dynamics of public-private service delivery

International Development Planning Review Ahead of print, 1–27.

Abstract

Public-private collaboration is deemed critical for improving service delivery in the global South. This article examines how relations between state and private investors develop over time - and, by extension, how they affect service delivery - in different collaborative arrangements. Through a comparative historical analysis of two mixed-ownership water and sanitation companies in Brazil, the article challenges conventional policy prescriptions that focus on the role of institutional rules in governing public-private relations and insulating service provision from politics. The findings show the importance of understanding how organisational factors - such as the type of private participation - intersect with political processes to (re-)configure public-private relations and the direction of service delivery temporally. The cases both unflatten generic treatments of private participation and problematise the emphasis on institutional solutions that seek to depoliticise service delivery. In fact, insulation may risk closing political channels through which more progressive service outcomes can be achieved.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

Abers, R. and Keck, M. (2006) ‘Muddy waters: the political construction of deliberative river basin governance in Brazil’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 601-622. Google Scholar

AESBE (Associação Brasileira das Empresas Estaduais de Saneamento) (2020) ‘Institucional’, https://aesbe.org.br/institucional/ (accessed 2 March 2020). Google Scholar

Albuquerque, G. (2011) ‘Estruturas de financiamento aplicáveis ao setor de saneamento básico’, BNDES Setorial, 34, 45-94. Google Scholar

Allen, J. and Pryke, M. (2013) ‘Financialising household water: Thames Water, MEIF, and “ring-fenced” politics’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(3), 419-439. Google Scholar

Andrés, L. A., Guasch, J. L. and Azumendi, S. L. (2011) ‘Governance in state-owned enterprises revisited: the cases of water and electricity in Latin America and the Caribbean’ (Working Paper 5747), Washington, DC, World Bank. Google Scholar

Arezki, R., Bolton, P., Peters, S., Samama, F. and Stiglitz, J. (2016) ‘From global savings glut to financing infrastructure: the advent of investment platforms’ (Working Paper No. WP/16/18), Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund. Google Scholar

Baer, M. (2014) ‘Private water, public good: water privatization and state capacity in Chile’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 49(2), 141-167. Google Scholar

Bakker, K. (2000) ‘Privatizing water, producing scarcity: the Yorkshire drought of 1995’, Economic Geography, 76(1), 4-27. Google Scholar

Bakker, K. (2010) Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World’s Urban Water Crisis, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press. Google Scholar

Bayliss, K. and Van Waeyenberge, E. (2018) ‘Unpacking the public private partnership revival’, Journal of Development Studies, 54(4), 577-593. Google Scholar

Boada, F. H. C. (2011) ‘Corporate governance in water and sanitation enterprises’ (technical note), Washington, DC, Inter-American Development Bank. Google Scholar

Budds, J. and McGranahan, G. (2003) ‘Are the debates on water privatization missing the point? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America’, Environment and Urbanization, 15(2), 87-113. Google Scholar

Castro, E. (2003) ‘Acionistas da Sanepar convocados pelo governo’, Tribuna do Paraná, 8 February. Google Scholar

Castro, E. (2008) ‘Sanepar Aprova Aumento e Requião nega’, Tribuna PR, 27 February. Google Scholar

Castro, V. and Janssens, J. (2008) ‘Mixed private-public ownership companies “Empresa Mixta”’, Washington, DC, Word Bank PPIAF. Google Scholar

Cioffi, J. W. and Höpner, M. (2006) ‘The political paradox of finance capitalism: interests, preferences, and center-left party politics in corporate governance reform’, Politics & Society, 34(4), 463-502. Google Scholar

Colli, A. (2013) ‘Coping with the Leviathan: minority shareholders in state-owned enterprises: evidence from Italy’, Business History, 55(2), 190-214. Google Scholar

Copasa (2003) ‘Relatório Anual’ (report), Belo Horizonte. Google Scholar

Copasa (2006) ‘Relatório Anual’ (report), Belo Horizonte. Google Scholar

Copasa (2015) ‘Trancrição da Teleconferência de Resultados 2T15’, 10 August. Google Scholar

Copasa (2016) ‘Transcrição da Teleconferência de Resultados 1T16’, 9 May. Google Scholar

Davis, J. (2004) ‘Corruption in public service delivery: experience from South Asia’s water and sanitation sector’, World Development, 32(1), 53-71. Google Scholar

Dubash, N. K. and Morgan, B. (2012) ‘Understanding the rise of the regulatory state of the South’, Regulation & Governance, 6(3), 261-281. Google Scholar

Farquharson, E., de Mästle, C. T. and Yescombe, E. R. (2011) ‘How to engage with the private sector in public-private partnerships in emerging markets’, Washington, DC, World Bank. Google Scholar

Garcia-Kilroy, C. and Rudolph, H. P. (2017) ‘Private financing of public infrastructure through PPPs in Latin America and the Caribbean’, Washington, DC, World Bank. Google Scholar

Graham, S. and Marvin, S. (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition, London, Routledge. Google Scholar

Guasch, J., Benitez, D., Portables, I. and Flor, L. (2014) ‘The renegotiation of PPP contracts: an overview of its recent evolution in Latin America’ (International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, 27-28 October), Paris. Google Scholar

Hall, D., Lobina, E. and de la Motte, R. (2005) ‘Public resistance to privatisation in water and energy’, Development in Practice, 15(3-4), 286-301. Google Scholar

Herrera, V. (2017) Water and Politics: Clientelism and Reform in Urban Mexico, Ann Harbor, University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. (1967) Development Projects Observed, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar

Idelovitch, E. and Ringskog, K. (1995) ‘Private sector participation in water supply and sanitation in Latin America’, Washington, DC, World Bank. Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976) ‘Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. Google Scholar

Jessop, B. (2016) The State: Past, Present, and Future, Cambridge, Polity Press. Google Scholar

Jomo, K. S., Chowdhury, A., Sharma, K. and Platz, D. (2016) ‘Public-private partnerships and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: fit for purpose?’ (Working Paper No. 148, 30), DESA, United Nations.. Google Scholar

Kang, D. L. and Sørensen, A. B. (1999) ‘Ownership organization and firm performance’, Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 121-144. Google Scholar

Klink, J., Empinotti, V. L. and Aversa, M. (2019) ‘On contested water governance and the making of urban financialisation: exploring the case of metropolitan São Paulo, Brazil’, Urban Studies, 57(8), 1676-1695. Google Scholar

Marques, E. C. and Bichir, R. M (2003) ‘Public policies, political cleavages and urban space: state infrastructure policies in São Paulo, Brazil, 1975-2000’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 811-827. Google Scholar

Mawdsley, E. (2018) ‘Development geography II: financialization’, Progress in Human Geography, 42(2), 264-274. Google Scholar

Ministério das Cidades (2015) ‘SNIS - Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento’ (data base), Brazil. Google Scholar

Miraftab, F. (2004) ‘Public-private partnerships: the trojan horse of neoliberal development?’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(1), 89-101. Google Scholar

Mohieldin, M. (2018) ‘SDGs and PPPs: What’s the connection?’, World Bank infrastructure and public-private partnerships blog, http://blogs.worldbank.org/ppps/sdgs-and-ppps-whats-connection (accessed 27 February 2019). Google Scholar

Murara, C. (1998) ‘Copel quer ser acionista da Sanepar’, Folha de Londrina, 6 June. Google Scholar

Murillo, M. V. (2009) Political Competition, Partisanship, and Policy Making in Latin America Market Reforms in Public Utilities, New York, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

Musacchio, A. and Lazzarini, S. (2014) Reinventing state capitalism: Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

O’Brien, P. and Pike, A. (2017) ‘The financialization and governance of infrastructure’, in R. Martin and J. Pollard (eds), Handbook on the Geographies of Money and Finance, Edward Elgar, 223-252. Google Scholar

Oliveira, T.G. (2015) ‘Abertura de Capital das Companhias Estaduais de Saneamento: Uma Análise a Partir da Experiência de Minas Gerais’ (PhD thesis), Belo Horizonte, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Google Scholar

Portal Saneamento Básico (2003) ‘Requião empossa diretoria da Sanepar’, Portal Saneamento Básico, 11 March. Google Scholar

Post, A. E. (2014) Foreign and Domestic Investment in Argentina: the Politics of Privatized Infrastructure, New York, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

Post, A. E. and Murillo, M. V. (2016) ‘How Investor portfolios shape regulatory outcomes: privatized infrastructure after crises’, World Development, 77, 328-345. Google Scholar

Sanepar (2001) ‘Financial Statements’ (report). Google Scholar

Sanepar (2002) ‘Informações Anuais: Comissão de Valores Imobiliários’. Google Scholar

Sanepar (2003) ‘Relatório Anual de Administração’ (report), Curitiba. Google Scholar

Sanepar (2015) ‘Relatório Anual de Administração’ (report), Curitiba. Google Scholar

Savedoff, W. D. and Spiller, P. T. (1999) ‘Spilled water: institutional commitment in the provision of water services’, Washington DC, Inter-American Development Bank. Google Scholar

Sclar, E. (2015) ‘The political economics of investment Utopia: public-private partnerships for urban infrastructure finance’, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(1), 1-15. Google Scholar

Seawright, J. and Gerring, J. (2008) ‘Case selection techniques in case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options’, Political Research Quarterly, 61, 294-308. Google Scholar

Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1997) ‘A survey of corporate governance’, The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. Google Scholar

Siemiatycki, M. (2013) ‘The global production of transportation public-private partnerships’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(4), 1254-1272. Google Scholar

Soares, J. and Hess, W. (2009) ‘Rating action: Moody’s confirms the rating of Sanepar but changes outlook to negative’, Moody’s Investor Service, 23 July. Google Scholar

Soederberg, S. (2010) Corporate Power and Ownership in Contemporary Capitalism: the Politics of Resistance and Domination, New York, Routledge. Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2005) ‘Dispossessing H2O the contested terrain of water privatization’, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(1), 81-98. Google Scholar

Torrance, M. (2008) ‘Forging glocal governance? Urban infrastructures as networked financial products’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 1-21. Google Scholar

Trebilcock, M. and Rosenstock, M. (2015) ‘Infrastructure public-private partnerships in the developing world: lessons from recent experience’, The Journal of Development Studies, 51(4), 335-354. Google Scholar

Vining, A. R. and Weimer, D. L. (2016) ‘The challenges of fractionalized property rights in public-private hybrid organizations: the good, the bad, and the ugly’, Regulation & Governance, 10(2), 161-178. Google Scholar

Vining, A. R., Boardman, A. E. and Moore, M. A. (2014) ‘The theory and evidence pertaining to local government mixed enterprises’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(1), 53-86. Google Scholar

Warsen, R., Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. (2019) ‘Mix and match: how contractual and relational conditions are combined in successful public-private partnerships’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 375-393. Google Scholar

Watson, V. (2009) ‘Seeing from the south: refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues’, Urban Studies 46(11), 2259-2275. Google Scholar

White, P. (2020) ‘“Bastard children”: unacknowledged consulting companies in development cooperation’, International Development Planning Review, 42(2), 219-240. Google Scholar

Xavier, P. H. (2004) ‘Sem Medo de Defender o Interesse Público’, Comunicado, Conselho de Administração da Sanepar, Curitiba. Google Scholar

Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D. and Jiang, Y. (2008) ‘Corporate governance in emerging economies: a review of the principal-principal perspective’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196-220. Google Scholar

Zingales, L. (2017) ‘Towards a political theory of the firm’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 113-130. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Cruxên, Isadora Araujo