Panarchy 3: River of the Sea

Clive, Rachel

doi:https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2021.26

Towards a Learning-Disabled-Led Ecological Performance Practice

Clive, Rachel

Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies (2021), 15, (3), 329–346.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2021.26
Language: English
Pages: 18

Abstract

The article reflects critically on Panarchy 3: River of the Sea, a learning-disabled-led ecological performance project that evolved in connection with the River Clyde from 2018 to 2019. River of the Sea was a collaboration between The Panarchy Projects at the University of Glasgow and the Friday Club at the Citizens’ Theatre in Glasgow. The Friday Club is a learning-disabled theatre group with fifteen members that meets once a week to socialize and develop performance skills, and The Panarchy Projects are an ongoing series of neurodivergent-led, ecological, and theatre-based research projects. The article introduces the exploratory praxis of the River of the Sea project, which combines theatre practice as research method with participatory action research methods within an expanded ecological field. It then analyses the findings, insights, and accounts of experience which were generated through this praxis and shared in two very different performance events. The article ends by discussing these findings, suggesting that learning-disabled-led ecological performance practices, such as those explored in the River of the Sea project, can support aesthetic experimentation, and nurture solidarity. The article hopes to contribute to the development of what Alison Kafer has called a “cripped environmentalism” (131), and to the building of a bridge between learning disability and environmental discourses.

FormatArticle

£25.00

READ THIS ARTICLE

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Works Cited

Calvert, Dave. “History, Performativity, and Dialectics: Critical Spectatorship in Learning Disabled Performance.” The Routledge Handbook of Disability Arts, Culture and Media. Ed. Bree Hadley and Donna McDonald. New York: Routledge, 2019. 176-88. Print. Google Scholar

Clare, Eli. “Notes on Natural Worlds, Disabled Bodies and a Politics of Cure.” Disability Studies and the Environmental Humanities: Toward an Eco-Crip Theory 7. Ed. Sarah Jaquette Ray and Jay Sibara. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 2017. 242-68. Print. Google Scholar

Cook, Tina and Pamela Inglis. “Participatory Research with Men with Learning Disability: Informed Consent.” Tizard Learning Disability Review 17.2 (2012): 92-101. Print. Google Scholar

Fenney, Deborah. “Ableism and Disablism in the UK Environmental Movement.” Environmental Values 26.4 (2017): 503-22. Print. Google Scholar

Fontana, Andrea and James H. Frey. “The Interview: From Neutral Stance to Political Involvement.” Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. 3rd edn. Ed. Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008. 695-728. Print. Google Scholar

Hadley, Bree. “Allyship in Disability Arts: Roles, Relationships, and Practices.” Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 25.2 (2020): 178-94. Print. Google Scholar

Hadley, Bree, Morgan Batch, and Michael Whelan. “The Entitled Ally: Authorship, Consultation, and the ‘Right’ to Stage Autistic People’s Stories.” Disability and Society (2020): 1-20 (Ahead of Print). Web. 16 Aug. 2020. Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2016. Print. Google Scholar

Hargrave, Matt. Theatres of Learning Disability: Good, Bad, or Plain Ugly? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Print. Google Scholar

Hydén, Margareta. “The Teller-Focused Interview: Interviewing As a Relational Practice.” Qualitative Social Work 13.6 (2014): 795-812. Print. Google Scholar

Kafer, Alison. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2013. Print. Google Scholar

Kindon, Sarah, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby. Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation, and Place. London: Routledge, 2007. Print. Google Scholar

Leighton, Fran. “Accountability: the Ethics of Devising a Practice-As-Research Performance with Learning Disabled Practitioners.” Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 14.1 (2009): 97-113. Print. Google Scholar

McCaffrey, Tony. “Institution, Care and Emancipation in Contemporary Theatre Involving Actors with Intellectual Disabilities.” The Routledge Handbook of Disability Arts, Culture and Media. Ed. Bree Hadley and Donna McDonald. New York: Routledge, 2019. 189-202. Print. Google Scholar

Nelson, Robin. Practice As Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Print. Google Scholar

Rakes, H. “Crip Feminist Trauma Studies in Jessica Jones and Beyond.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 13.1 (2019): 75-91. Print. Google Scholar

Reason, Matthew. “Ways of Watching: Five Aesthetics of Learning Disability Theatre.” The Routledge Handbook of Disability Arts, Culture and Media. Ed. Bree Hadley and Donna McDonald. New York: Routledge, 2019. 163-75. Print. Google Scholar

Sayers, Paul, Matt Horritt, Edmund Penning-Rowsell, Andrew McKenzie, and David Thompson. “The Analysis of Future Flood Risk in the UK Using the Future Flood Explorer.” E3S Web of Conferences 7, 21005 (2016). Web. Google Scholar

Shakepeare, Tom, Nicholas Watson, Richard Brunner, Jane Cullingworth, Shaffa Hameed, Nathaniel Sherer, Charlotte Pearson, and Veronika Reichenberger. “Disabled People in Britain and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Preprints 202101.0563.v1 (2021). Web. Google Scholar

Trimingham, Melissa. “A Methodology for Practice as Research.” Studies in Theatre and Performance 22.1 (2002): 54-60. Print. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Clive, Rachel

Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies