Town Planning Review

The integrating role of regional spatial planning: five mechanisms of policy integration

Town Planning Review (2022), 93, (4), 423–450.

Abstract

Policy integration is considered an essential condition for constructing a more sustainable society, but proponents of sustainable development differ in their views about what is to be integrated, what is to be developed, how to link environment and development, and for how long a time. Regional spatial planning has been a locus of attempts to resolve these differences and realise policy integration, but its mechanisms to achieve this remain less explored. This study sets out to meet three objectives as follows: (1) to identify, through a systematic literature review, a broad set of mechanisms by which (regional) spatial planning realises joined-up policy making; (2) to illustrate the identified mechanisms in two distinct spatial planning systems, Germany and England; and (3) to generate insights into factors that contribute to, and confine, the identified mechanisms. The findings identify five integrating mechanisms of spatial planning that could inform plan making, analysis and monitoring and provide lessons about the potential and constraints of these mechanisms in different social, institutional and political contexts.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

ALBRECHTS, L., HEALEY, P. and KUNZMANN, K. R. (2003), ‘Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 113-29. Google Scholar

ALLMENDINGER, P. and HAUGHTON, G. (2010), ‘Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 803-18. Google Scholar

BADEN, T. and SWAIN, C. (2013), ‘Government expectations of regional spatial strategies’, in C. Swain, T. Marshall and T. Baden (eds), English Regional Planning 2000-2010: Lessons for the Future, Abingdon, Routledge, 113-34. Google Scholar

BAKER, M. (1998), ‘Planning for the English regions: a review of the Secretary of State’s regional planning guidance’, Planning Practice and Research, 13, 153-69. Google Scholar

BAKER, M., HINCKS, S. and SHERRIFF, G. (2010), ‘Getting involved in plan making: participation and stakeholder involvement in local and regional spatial strategies in England’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 574-94. Google Scholar

BBSR (BUNDESINSTITUT FÜR BAU-, STADT- UND RAUMFORSCHUNG) (2011), ‘Raumordnungsbericht 2011’, Bonn. Google Scholar

BBSR (BUNDESINSTITUT FÜR BAU-, STADT- UND RAUMFORSCHUNG) (2019), ‘Metropolregion Rhein-Neckar | Landschaftskonzept 2020+’, Bonn. Google Scholar

BEULE, J. L. (2014), ‘Freiburg will wachsen: auf Kosten von Grünflächen’, Badische Zeitung, 5 March 2014, https://www.badische-zeitung.de/freiburg/wohnbau-contra-naturschutz (accessed 30 November 2021). Google Scholar

BLOTEVOGEL, H. H., DANIELZYK, R. and MÜNTER, A. (2014), ‘Spatial planning in Germany’, in M. Reimer, P. Getimis and H. H. Blotevogel (eds), Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe, Abingdon, Routledge, 83-108. Google Scholar

BLOTEVOGEL, H. H. and SCHELHAAS, B. (2011), ‘Geschichte der Raumordnung’, in K. Borchard (ed.), Grundriss der Raumordnung und Raumentwicklung, Hanover, Verlag der ARL, 76-200. Google Scholar

BOELL, S. K. and CECEZ-KECMANOVIC, D. (2015), ‘On being “systematic” in literature reviews in IS’, Journal of Information Technology, 30, 161-73. Google Scholar

BOGUMIL, J. (2018), ‘Kommunale Selbsverwaltung’, in H. H. Blotevogel, T. Döring and S. Grotefels (eds), Handwörterbuch der Stadt und Raumentwicklung, Hanover, Verlag der ARL, 1127-32. Google Scholar

BROMBACH, K., FRICKE, A. and JESSEN, J. (2015), ‘Kommunale Strategien im Vergleich: urbanes Wohnen in Stuttgart, Mannheim und Freiburg’, in A. Fricke, S. Siedentop and P. Zakrzewski (eds), Arbeitsberichte der ARL, Volume 14, Reurbanisierung in Baden-Württembergischen Stadtregionen, Hanover, Verlag der ARL, 118-70. Google Scholar

BRYSON, J. M. and SHIVELY SLOTTERBACK, C. (2017), ‘Strategic spatial planning in the USA’, in L. Albrechts, A. Balducci and J. Hillier (eds), Situated Practices of Strategic Planning: An International Perspective, Abingdon, Routledge, 117-34. Google Scholar

CAMPBELL, S. (1996), ‘Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 296-312. Google Scholar

CHESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL (2006), ‘West Cheshire/North East Wales Sub-regional Spatial Strategy and strategic environmental assessment process report’, Chester, Cheshire County Council. Google Scholar

CULLINGWORTH, B. and NADIN, V. (2006), Town and Country Planning in the UK (14th edn), Abingdon, Routledge. Google Scholar

DEMAZIÈRE, C. and SERRANO, J. (2017), ‘The role of strategic spatial planning in territorial sustainability: the case of France’, in Albrechts et al. (eds), 101-16. Google Scholar

DE ROO, G. (2012), ‘Spatial planning, complexity and a world “out of equilibrium”: outline of a non-linear approach to planning’, in G. De Roo, J. Hillier and J. van Wezemael (eds), Complexity and Spatial Planning: Systems, Assemblages and Simulations, Farnham, Ashgate, 129-65. Google Scholar

DETR (DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS) (1999), A Better Quality of Life, London, DETR. Google Scholar

FALUDI, A. (2000), ‘The performance of spatial planning’, Planning Practice and Research, 15, 299-318. Google Scholar

FAO (FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS) (2008), ‘Overview of the planning process’, http://www.fao.org/3/t0715e/t0715e03.htm (accessed 8 March 2020). Google Scholar

FELLS, R. (2009), Effective Negotiation: From Research to Results, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

FÜRST, D. (1999), ‘Weiche Kooperationsstrukturen: eine ausreichende Antwort auf den Kooperationsbedarf in Stadtregionen?’, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 9, 609-15. Google Scholar

GALLAND, D. (2012), ‘Understanding the reorientations and roles of spatial planning: the case of national planning policy in Denmark’, European Planning Studies, 20, 1359-92. Google Scholar

GEERLINGS, H. and STEAD, D. (2003), ‘The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research’, Transport Policy, 10, 187-96. Google Scholar

GROWE, A. (2009), ‘Wissensallianzen und regionale Wissenskonzepte als Baustein zur Nutzung von Wissen in Metropolregionen’, in U. Matthiesen (ed.), Das Wissen der Städte: Neue stadtregionale Entwicklungsdynamiken im Kontext von Wissen, Milieus und Governance, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 323-42. Google Scholar

GROWE, A. (2018), ‘Metropolregionen’, in Blotevogel et al. (eds), 1507-17. Google Scholar

GROWE, A. and FREYTAG, T. (2019), ‘Image and implementation of sustainable urban development: showcase projects and other projects in Freiburg, Heidelberg and Tübingen, Germany’, Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 77, 457-74. Google Scholar

GROWE, A. and JEMMING, M. (2019), ‘Regional councils in a global context: council types and council elements’, Urban Science, 3, 22. Google Scholar

GRUEHN, D. (2017), ‘Regional planning and projects in the Ruhr Region (Germany)’, in M. Yokohari, A. Murakami, Y. Hara and K. Tsuchiya (eds), Science for Sustainable Societies/IR3S. Sustainable Landscape Planning in Selected Urban Regions, Tokyo, Springer, 215-25. Google Scholar

GUALINI, E. and FRICKE, C. (2018), ‘Who governs Berlin’s metropolitan region? The strategic- relational construction of metropolitan scale in Berlin-Brandenburg’s economic development policies’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37, 59-80, https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418776549 (accessed 29 November 2021). Google Scholar

GUNDER, M. and HILLIER, J. (2009), Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning, Farnham, Ashgate. Google Scholar

GUSTAFSSON, S., HERMELIN, B. and SMAS, L. (2019), ‘Integrating environmental sustainability into strategic spatial planning: the importance of management’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62, 1321-38. Google Scholar

HAGER, C. (2012), ‘Revisiting the ungovernability debate: regional governance and sprawl in the USA and UK’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36, 817-30. Google Scholar

HARRISON, J. and GROWE, A. (2014a), ‘From places to flows? Planning for the new “regional world” in Germany’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 21, 21-41. Google Scholar

HARRISON, J. and GROWE, A. (2014b), ‘When regions collide: in what sense a new “regional problem”?’, Environment and Planning A, 46, 2332-52. Google Scholar

HAUGHTON, G. and ALLMENDINGER, P. (2008), ‘The soft spaces of local economic development’, Local Economy, 23, 138-48. Google Scholar

HAUGHTON, G., ALLMENDINGER, P., COUNSELL, D. and VIGAR, G. (2010), The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries, Abingdon, Routledge. Google Scholar

HEALEY, P. (1993), ‘The communicative work of development plans’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 83-104. Google Scholar

HEINS, S., VAN DAM, F. and GOETGELUK, R. (2002), ‘The pseudo-countryside as a compromise between spatial planning goals and consumers’ preferences’, Built Environment, 28, 311-18. Google Scholar

HELEY, J. (2013), ‘Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and spatial governance in post-devolution Wales’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 1325-48. Google Scholar

HELLING, A. (1998), ‘Collaborative visioning: proceed with caution! Results from evaluating Atlanta’s Vision 2020 project’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, 335-49. Google Scholar

HERITIER, A. (1996), ‘The accommodation of diversity in European policy-making and its outcomes: regulatory policy as a patchwork’, Journal of European Public Policy, 3, 149-67. Google Scholar

HESSE, M. and LEICK, A. (2013), ‘Wachstum, Innovation, Metropolregionen: zur Rekonstruktion des jüngeren Leitbildwandels in der deutschen Raumentwicklungspolitik’, Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 71, 343-59. Google Scholar

HM GOVERNMENT (2004), Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, London, HMSO. Google Scholar

HORAN, D. (2020), ‘Enabling integrated policymaking with the Sustainable Development Goals: an application to Ireland’, Sustainability, 12, Advance online publication, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7800 (accessed 29 November 2021). Google Scholar

HOYLER, M., FREYTAG, T. and MAGER, C. (2006), ‘Advantageous fragmentation? Reimagining metropolitan governance and spatial planning in Rhine-Main’, Built Environment, 32, 124-36. Google Scholar

JACOB, K. and KANNEN, H. (2015), ‘Integrated strategies for climate policy integration and coherence: the case of Germany’ (FFU-Report 02), Environmental Policy Research Centre, Free University of Berlin. Google Scholar

KARLSSON-VINKHUYZEN, S., DAHL, A. L. and PERSSON, Å. (2018), ‘The emerging accountability regimes for the Sustainable Development Goals and policy integration: friend or foe?’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36, 1371-90. Google Scholar

KIDD, S. (2007), ‘Towards a framework of integration in spatial planning: an exploration from a health perspective’, Planning Theory & Practice, 8, 161-81. Google Scholar

KIDD, S., CALADO, H., GEE, K., GILEK, M. and SAUNDERS, F. (2020), ‘Marine spatial planning and sustainability: examining the roles of integration-scale, policies, stakeholders and knowledge’, Ocean & Coastal Management, 191, Advance online publication, https://www.msp-platform.eu/practices/marine-spatial-planning-and-sustainability-examining-roles-integration-scales-policy (accessed 29 November 2021). Google Scholar

KÖHLER, S. (2009), ‘Großräumige grenzüberschreitende Verflechtungsräume in Deutschland’, Standort (Standort Zeitschrift für Angewandte Geographie), 33, 33-39. Google Scholar

KÜHNAU, C. (2016), ‘Integration in die räumliche Gesamtplanung’, in W. Riedel, H. Lange, E. Jedicke and M. Reinke (eds), Landschaftsplanung, Berlin and Heidelberg, Springer, 393-407. Google Scholar

LARSSON, S. (2014), ‘What type of knowledge rules where? Legally regulated participation in large-scale mobile infrastructure planning in Sweden’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 163-83. Google Scholar

LAURIAN, L. (2009), ‘Trust in planning: theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning’, Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 369-91. Google Scholar

LOWE, M., WHITZMAN, C. and GILES-CORTI, B. (2018), ‘Health-promoting spatial planning: approaches for strengthening urban policy integration’, Planning Theory & Practice, 19, 180-97. Google Scholar

METZ, F., ANGST, M. and FISCHER, M. (2020), ‘Policy integration: do laws or actors integrate issues relevant to flood risk management in Switzerland?’, Global Environmental Change, 61, Advance online publication, https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/eawag/islandora/object/eawag%3A20382 (accessed 29 November 2021). Google Scholar

MILLER, J. and SCHAMESS, G. (2000), ‘The discourse of denigration and the creation of “other”’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 27, 39-62. Google Scholar

MORPHET, J. (2011), Effective Practice in Spatial Planning, Abingdon, Routledge. Google Scholar

MOSS, B. (2008), ‘The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise?’, Science of the Total Environment, 400, 32-41. Google Scholar

MÜNTER, A. and REIMER, M. (2020), ‘Planning systems on the move? Persistence and change of the German planning system’, Planning Practice & Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1832362. Google Scholar

NADIN, V. (2006), The Role and Scope of Spatial Planning: Literature Review. Spatial Plans in Practice Supporting the Reform of Spatial Planning, London, Department of Communities and Local Government. Google Scholar

NEUMAN, M. (1998), ‘Does planning need the plan?’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, 208-20. Google Scholar

NWRA (NORTH WEST REGIONAL ASSEMBLY) (2004), ‘Briefing paper 6: regional parks’, Wigan, NWRA. Google Scholar

O’CONNOR, K. M. and CARNEVALE, P. J. (1997), ‘A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: misrepresentation of a common-value issue’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 504-15. Google Scholar

OLESEN, K. (2012), ‘Soft spaces as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning?’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 910-23. Google Scholar

OTHENGRAFEN, F., KNIELING, J., HAUGHTON, G. and ALLMENDINGER, P. (2015), ‘Conclusion: what difference do soft spaces make?’, in P. Allmendinger, G. Haughton, J. Knieling and F. Othengrafen (eds), Soft Spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating Governance, Boundaries and Borders, Abingdon, Routledge, 215-35. Google Scholar

PAHL-WEBER, E. and HENCKEL, D. (eds) (2008), Studies in Spatial Development, Volume 7, The Planning System and Planning Terms in Germany: A Glossary, Hanover, Verlag der ARL. Google Scholar

PALERMO, P. C. and PONZINI, D. (2010), Spatial Planning and Urban Development: Critical Perspectives, Volume 10, Dordrecht, Springer. Google Scholar

PARÉ, G. and KITSIOU, S. (2016), ‘Methods for literature reviews’, in F. Lau and C. Kuziemsky (eds), Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach, Victoria, University of Victoria, 157-79. Google Scholar

PARRIS, T. M. and KATES, R. W. (2003), ‘Characterizing and measuring sustainable development’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559-86. Google Scholar

PAYNE, D.and REID, C. (2013), ‘Longer-term environmental challenges’, in C. Swain, T. Marshall and T. Baden (eds), English Regional Planning 2000-2010: Lessons for the Future, Abingdon, Routledge, 74-94. Google Scholar

PEARCE, G. and AYRES, S. (2006), ‘New patterns of governance in the English region: assessing their implications for spatial planning’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 909-27. Google Scholar

PEARCE, G. and AYRES, S. (2009), ‘Governance in the English regions: the role of the regional development agencies’, Urban Studies, 46, 537-57. Google Scholar

PETTERSSON, F. and FRISK, H. (2016), ‘Soft space regional planning as an approach for integrated transport and land use planning in Sweden: challenges and ways forward’, Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 4, 64-82. Google Scholar

PRIEBS, A. (2019), Die Stadtregion: Planung - Politik - Management, UTB. Google Scholar

PRITCHARD, A. (2013), ‘Spatial strategies for housing and the economy’, in Swain et al. (eds), 31-53. Google Scholar

RAIFFA, H. (1994), The Art and Science of Negotiation, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

RAIFFA, H., RICHARDSON, J. and METCALFE, D. (2007), Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

REGIONALVERBAND SÜDLICHER OBERRHEIN (1995), Regionalplan Südlicher Oberrhein (Stand 1995), Freiburg, Regionalverband Südlicher Oberrhein. Google Scholar

REGIONALVERBAND SÜDLICHER OBERRHEIN (2019), Regionalplan Südlicher Oberrhein (Stand 2019), Freiburg, Regionalverband Südlicher Oberrhein, https://www.rvso.de/de/planung/regionalplan/index.php (accessed 20 August 2019). Google Scholar

RENARD, V. (2007), ‘Property rights and the “transfer of development rights”: questions of efficiency and equity’, Town Planning Review, 78, 41-60. Google Scholar

RIDDELL, C. (2013), ‘Coalescing views around a strategy’, in Swain et al. (eds), 9-30. Google Scholar

RINGLI, H. (2003), ‘Plan-making in the Zürich region’, in P. Healey, A, Khakee, A. Motte and B. Needham (eds), Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe, London, Routledge, 115-33. Google Scholar

ROGGE, J.-P. (2018), ‘Regionaler Flächennutzungsplan’, in Blotevogel et al. (eds), 2017-22. Google Scholar

SCHMIDT, S. (1995), ‘The integration of the European telecommunication and electricity sectors in the light of international relations theories and comparative politics’ (paper presented at the ECPR Workshop on European Multilateralism, Bordeaux, 27th April-2nd May). Google Scholar

SCHMIDT, S. (2009), ‘Land use planning tools and institutional change in Germany: recent developments in local and regional planning’, European Planning Studies, 17, 1907-21. Google Scholar

SCHMITT, P. and DANIELZYK, R. (2018), ‘Exploring the planning-governance nexus’, disP: The Planning Review, 54, 16-20. Google Scholar

SELF, P. (1964), ‘Regional planning in Britain’, Urban Studies, 1, 55-70. Google Scholar

SHAW, R. (2002), ‘The International Building Exhibition (IBA) Emscher Park, Germany: a model for sustainable restructuring?’, European Planning Studies, 10, 77-97. Google Scholar

STADT FREIBURG (2017), ‘Bürgerdialog zur Entwicklung des neuen Stadtteils: Wissenswertes: Daten und Fakten 03: warum benötigt Freiburg einen neuen Stadtteil?’, https://www.freiburg.de/pb/site/Freiburg/get/params_E2047278867/1314983/Wissenswertes%2003.pdf (accessed 30 November 2021). Google Scholar

STADT FREIBURG (2019), ‘Fragen und Antworten zu Dietenbach: Amtsblatt-Sonderseiten zu Dietenbach’, Amtsblatt der Stadt Freiburg, 15 February 2019, https://www.freiburg.de/pb/site/Freiburg/get/documents_E-1428222886/freiburg/daten/news/amtsblatt/pdf/SoSe_Dietenbach_19.pdf (accessed 30 November 2021). Google Scholar

STEAD, D. and MEIJERS, E. (2009), ‘Spatial planning and policy integration: concepts, facilitators and inhibitors’, Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 317-32. Google Scholar

SWAIN, C., MARSHALL, T. and BADEN, T. (2013), ‘Conclusions’, in Swain et al. (eds), 175-90. Google Scholar

TAYLOR, P. J. (1999), ‘Places, spaces and Macy’s: place-space tensions in the political geography of modernities’, Progress in Human Geography, 23, 7-26. Google Scholar

TEWDWR-JONES, M. and ALLMENDINGER, P. (1998), ‘Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning’, Environment and Planning A, 30, 1975-89. Google Scholar

TEWDWR-JONES, M., GALLENT, N. and MORPHET, J. (2010), ‘An anatomy of spatial planning: coming to terms with the spatial element in UK planning’, European Planning Studies, 18, 239-57. Google Scholar

TIETZ, A. (2018), Inanspruchnahme von Landwirtschaftsfläche durch Freiflächen-Photovoltaik-Anlagen im Jahr 2017, Braunschweig, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut. Google Scholar

TUROWSKI, G. (2002), ‘Spatial planning in Germany: structures and concepts’, Studies in Spatial Development, Volume 1, Hanover, Verlag der ARL. Google Scholar

UK2070 COMMISSION (2020), Make No Little Plans: Acting at Scale for a Fairer and Stronger Future. Final Report of the UK2070 Commission, Desk Top Publishing by Barton Willmore, UK2070 Commission Partners. Google Scholar

VAN ASSCHE, K., BEUNEN, R. and OLIVEIRA, E. (2020), ‘Spatial planning and place branding: rethinking relations and synergies’, European Planning Studies, 28, 1274-90. Google Scholar

VAN ASSCHE, K. and DJANIBEKOV, N. (2012), ‘Spatial planning as policy integration: the need for an evolutionary perspective. Lessons from Uzbekistan’, Land Use Policy, 29, 179-86. Google Scholar

VAN RIJ, E. and KORTHALS ALTES, W. (2010), ‘Looking for the optimum relationship between spatial planning and land development’, Town Planning Review, 81, 283-306. Google Scholar

VON HAAREN, C. and REICH, M. (2006), ‘The German way to greenways and habitat networks’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 76, 7-22. Google Scholar

WAGNER, M., MAGER, C., SCHMIDT, N., KIESE, N. and GROWE, A. (2019), ‘Conflicts about urban green spaces in metropolitan areas under conditions of climate change: a multidisciplinary analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions of planning processes’, Urban Science, 3, 1-20. Google Scholar

WALLIHAN, J. (1998), ‘Negotiating to avoid agreement’, Negotiation Journal, 14, 257-68. Google Scholar

WANG, L. and SHEN, J. (2016), ‘Spatial planning and its implementation in provincial China: a case study of the Jiangsu region along the Yangtze river plan’, Journal of Contemporary China, 25, 669-85. Google Scholar

WANNOP, U. (2014), The Regional Imperative: Regional Planning and Governance in Britain, Europe and the United States, Abingdon, Routledge. Google Scholar

WATKINS, M. (1998), ‘Building momentum in negotiations: time-related costs and action-forcing events’, Negotiation Journal, 14, 241-56. Google Scholar

WEILAND, U., WOHLLEBER-FELLER, S., GAWRON, T. and NUISSL, H. (2007), Einführung in die Raum- und Umweltplanung, Paderborn, Schöningh. Google Scholar

WOLSINK, M. (2003), ‘Reshaping the Dutch planning system: a learning process?’, Environment and Planning A, 35, 705-23. Google Scholar

ZIAFATI BAFARASAT, A. (2014), ‘The application of strategic spatial planning under regionalist and localist approaches to public policy’ (doctoral dissertation), University of Manchester, Manchester. Google Scholar

ZIAFATI BAFARASAT, A. (2015), ‘Reflections on the three schools of thought on strategic spatial planning’, Journal of Planning Literature, 30, 132-48. Google Scholar

ZIAFATI BAFARASAT, A. (2016a), ‘Exploring new systems of regionalism: an English case study’, Cities, 50, 119-28. Google Scholar

ZIAFATI BAFARASAT, A. (2016b), ‘In pursuit of productive conflict in strategic planning: project identification’, European Planning Studies, 24, 2057-75. Google Scholar

ZIAFATI BAFARASAT, A. (2016c), ‘Meta-governance and soft projects: a hypothetical model for regional policy integration’, Land Use Policy, 59, 251-59. Google Scholar

ZIAFATI BAFARASAT, A. and BAKER, M. (2016), ‘Building consensus for network power? Some reflections on strategic spatial planning in the North West region of England’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 900-26. Google Scholar

ZIAFATI BAFARASAT, A. and PUGALIS, L. (2020), ‘In search of cohesive metropolitan governance: enticements and obligations’, European Planning Studies, 28, 1474-92. Google Scholar

ZIMMERMANN, K. (2008), ‘Regionale Kooperation jenseits der Ländergrenzen: die Europäische Metropolregion Rhein-Neckar’, Standort Zeitschrift für angewandte Geographie, 32, 152-59. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Bafarasat, Abbas Ziafati

Baker, Mark

Growe, Anna