Town Planning Review

A review of land development strategies for urban development: technical function and rationales

Town Planning Review Ahead of print, 1–24.

Abstract

Land development is crucial to the process of urban development. Depending on present ownership structure, the promoter-sponsor-developer must acquire one or more plots in a land assembly process. After land assembly, further steps must be taken to make the location suitable for development. Globally, many land development strategies are in place to make sure that land becomes available at the right time and at a fair price, often with huge difference in outcomes and rationales behind them. This article aims to provide a review both of the technical function of land development strategies and of the rationales behind them.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

ADAMS, D. and TIESDELL, S. (2012), Shaping Places: Urban Planning, Design and Development, Abingdon, Routledge. Google Scholar

ADB (ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK) (2008), Public-Private Partnership Handbook, Manila, Asian Development Bank. Google Scholar

AERNOUTS, N. and RYCKEWAERT, M. (2018), ‘Beyond housing: on the role of commoning in the establishment of a Community Land Trust project’, International Journal of Housing Policy, 18, 503-21. Google Scholar

ALBRECHT, J. (2018), ‘Compulsory property acquisition for urban densification in Germany’, in G. Searle (ed.), Compulsory Property Acquisition for Urban Densification, Abingdon, Routledge, 51-66. Google Scholar

ALEXANDER, F. S. (2005), ‘Land bank strategies for renewing urban land’, Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law, 14, 140-69. Google Scholar

ALLEN, T. (2000), The Right to Property in Commonwealth Constitutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

ALTERMAN, R. (2009), ‘Can the unearned increment in land values be harnessed to supply affordable housing?’ (UN Habitat GLNT Conference, Warsaw, October 2009). Google Scholar

ALTERMAN, R. (2012), ‘Land use regulations and property values: the windfalls capture idea revisited’, in G. Knaap and N. Brooks (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 755-86. Google Scholar

ARCHER, R. (1992), ‘Introducing the urban land pooling/readjustment technique into Thailand to improve urban development and land supply’, Public Administration and Development, 12, 155-74. Google Scholar

BASSETT, E. and JACOBS, H. (1997), ‘Community-based tenure reform in urban Africa: the community land trust experiment in Voi, Kenya’, Land Use Policy, 14, 215-29. Google Scholar

BENSON, B. L. (2008), ‘The evolution of eminent domain: a remedy for market failure or an effort to limit government power and government failure?’, Independent Review, 12, 423-32. Google Scholar

BUITELAAR, E. (2010), ‘Cracks in the myth: challenges to land policy in the Netherlands’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101, 349-56. Google Scholar

BUITELAAR, E. and BREGMAN, A. (2016), ‘Dutch land development institutions in the face of crisis: trembling pillars in the planners’ paradise’, European Planning Studies, 24, 1281-94. Google Scholar

CAESAR, C. (2016), ‘Municipal landownership and housing in Sweden’ (doctoral thesis), Real Estate Planning and Land Law Department of Real Estate and Construction, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1044229/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed 1 December 2021). Google Scholar

CALAVITA, N. and MALLACH, A. (2009), ‘Inclusionary housing, incentives and land value recapture’, Land Lines, 21, 15-21. Google Scholar

CERVERO, R. and MURAKAMI, J. (2009), ‘Rail and property development in Hong Kong: experiences and extensions’, Urban Studies, 46, 2019-43. Google Scholar

COHEN, S. A. (2005), ‘State responsibility and attribution: when is a state responsible for the acts of state enterprises?’, in T. Weiler (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law, London, Cameron May Ltd, 17-45. Google Scholar

COX, G. (2018), ‘Compulsory acquisition in UK public housing estate renewal’, in Searle (ed.), 32-50. Google Scholar

CULLINGWORTH, B. (1994), The Political Culture of Planning: American Land Use Planning in Comparative Perspective, New York and London, Routledge. Google Scholar

DAVIS, J. (2010), Origins and Evolution of the Community Land Trusts in the United States, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Google Scholar

DAVY, B. (2007), ‘Mandatory happiness? Land readjustment and property in Germany’, in Y.-H. Hong and B. Needham (eds), Analyzing Land Readjustment: Economics, Law, and Collective Action, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 37-56. Google Scholar

ELLICKSON, R.C. (1981), ‘The irony of inclusionary zoning’ (Faculty Scholarship Series, FS Paper 468), https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/468 (accessed 1 December 2021). Google Scholar

ENEMARK, S. (2005), ‘Land management and development’ (CLGE International Conference 2005, European Professional Qualifications in Geodetic Surveying, Brussels, 1-2 December 2005). Google Scholar

FIRMANS, T. (2000), ‘Rural to urban land conversion in Indonesia during boom and bust periods’, Land Use Policy, 17, 13-20. Google Scholar

FUJII, Y. (2016), ‘Spotlight on the main actors: how land banks and community development corporations stabilize and revitalize Cleveland neighborhoods in the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis’, Housing Policy Debate, 26, 296-315. Google Scholar

GEORGE, H. (1881), Progress and Poverty, New York, D. Appleton and Company. Google Scholar

GLAESER, E. and GYOURKO, J. (2003), ‘The impact of building restrictions on housing affordability’, FRBNY Economic Policy Review, June 2003, 21-39. Google Scholar

GUO, X. (2001), ‘Land expropriation and rural conflicts in China’, China Quarterly, 166, 422-39. Google Scholar

HALKIER, H., DANSON, M. and DAMBORG, C. (2017), Regional Development Agencies in the New Europe, London, Routledge. Google Scholar

HALL, D., P. HIRSCH and LI, T. M. (2011), Powers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia, Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press. Google Scholar

HARTMANN, T. and NEEDHAM, B. (eds) (2012), Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered, Farnham, Ashgate. Google Scholar

HARTMANN, T. and SPIT, T. (2015), ‘Dilemmas of involvement in land management: comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach’, Land Use Policy, 42, 729-37. Google Scholar

HELLER, M. A. (2000), ‘Critical approaches to property institutions’, Columbia Law School: Scholarship Archive, 79, 417-34. Google Scholar

HOLTSLAG-BROEKHOF, S., HARTMANN, T. and SPIT, T. (2018), ‘Compulsory acquisition in the Netherlands’, in Searle (ed.), 8-17. Google Scholar

HOLZMAN-GAZIT, Y. (2007), Land Expropriation in Israel: Law, Culture and Society, London, Routledge. Google Scholar

HONG, Y.-H. (2007), ‘Assembling land for urban development’, in Hong and Needham (eds), 4-34. Google Scholar

HONG, Y.-H. and BRAIN, I. (2012), ‘Land readjustment for urban development and post-disaster reconstruction’, Land Lines, January 2012, 1-9. Google Scholar

INGRAM, G. and HONG, Y.-H. (2012), ‘Land value capture: types and outcomes’, in G. Ingram and Y.-H. Hong (eds), Value Capture and Land Policies: Proceedings of the 2011 Land Policy Conference, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 3-18. Google Scholar

JACOBS, H. M. (2008), ‘The future of the regulatory takings issue in the US and Europe: divergence or convergence?’, Urban Lawyer, 40, 51-72. Google Scholar

KANDA, H. (2016), ‘A trust for commercial use in Japan: an unexpected winner in the race among organizational forms’, in Research Seminar, Law and Finance, Paris, 599-604. Google Scholar

KORTHALS ALTES, W. (2019), ‘Multiple land use planning for living places and investment spaces’, European Planning Studies, 27, 1146-58. Google Scholar

KRESSE, K., KANG, M., KIM, S. and VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (2020), ‘Value capture ideals and practice: development stages and the evolution of value capture policies’, Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102861 (accessed 1 December 2021). Google Scholar

LABBÉ, D. (2011), ‘Urban destruction and land disputes in periurban Hanoi during the late-socialist period’, Pacific Affairs, 84, 435-54. Google Scholar

LABBÉ, D. and MUSIL, C. (2013), ‘Periurban land redevelopment in Vietnam under market socialism’, Urban Studies, 51, 1146-61. Google Scholar

LEIGLAND, J. and THOMAS, R. H. (1997), ‘Municipal bonds as alternatives to PPPs: facilitating direct municipal access to private capital’, Development Southern Africa, 16, 729-50. Google Scholar

LIN, T.-C. (2005), ‘Land assembly in a fragmented land market through land readjustment’, Land Use Policy, 22, 95-102. Google Scholar

LOUW, E. (2008), ‘Land assembly for urban transformation: the case of ’s-Hertogenbosch in the Netherlands’, Land Use Policy, 25, 69-80. Google Scholar

MCMICHAEL, P. (2012), ‘The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, 681-701. Google Scholar

MEDDA, F. (2012), ‘Land value capture finance for transport accessibility: a review’, Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 154-61. Google Scholar

MELOT, R. (2018), ‘Pre-emption rights in France’, in J.-D. Gerber, T. Hartmann and A. Hengstermann (eds), Instruments of Land Policy: Dealing with Scarcity of Land, London, Routledge, 199-212. Google Scholar

MICELI, T. (1991), ‘Compensation for the taking of land under eminent domain’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 147, 354-63. Google Scholar

MISHRA, A. K. and MOHANTY, P. K. (2017), ‘Urban policy in Asia Pacific countries: a case for inclusionary zoning and housing’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 1, 191-215. Google Scholar

MUKHIJA, V., DAS, A., REGUS, L. and TSAY, S. S. (2015), ‘The tradeoffs of inclusionary zoning: what do we know and what do we need to know?’, Planning Practice and Research, 30, 222-35. Google Scholar

MUNCH, P. (1976), ‘An economic analysis of eminent domain’, Journal of Political Economy, 84, 473-97. Google Scholar

MUÑOZ-GIELEN, D. and VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (eds) (2019), Public Infrastructure, Private Finance, London, Routledge. Google Scholar

NAHRATH, S. (2018), ‘A Swiss perspective on pre-emption rights: impact without application. Disputes over pre-emptions and the “land scarcity”’, in Gerber et al. (eds), 213-17. Google Scholar

NEEDHAM, B. (2014), Dutch Land-Use Planning: The Principles and the Practice, Farnham, Ashgate. Google Scholar

NGUYEN, T., VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and MUSIL, C. (2018), ‘“Land for infrastructure” in Ho Chi Minh City: land-based financing of transport improvement’, International Planning Studies, 23, 310-26. Google Scholar

PLATZ, D. (2009), Infrastructure Finance in Developing Countries: The Potential of Sub-Sovereign Bonds, (Working Paper No. 76), New York, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, doi. org/10.18356/1c2ed0b1-en. Google Scholar

PLOEGER, H. and BOUNJOUH, H. (2017), ‘The Dutch urban ground lease: a valuable tool for land policy?’, Land Use Policy, 63, 78-85. Google Scholar

RICARDO, D. (1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London, John Murray. Google Scholar

ROUWENDAL, J. and VAN DER STRAATEN, W. (2006), ‘Measuring welfare effects of spatial planning’, TESG, 98, 276-83. Google Scholar

SAGALYN, L. B. (2007), ‘Land assembly, land readjustment, and public-private redevelopment’, in Hong and Needham (eds), 159-82. Google Scholar

SANDRONI, P. (2010), ‘A new financial instrument of value capture in São Paulo: certificates of additional construction potential’, in G. Ingram and Y.-H. Hong (eds), Municipal Revenues and Land Policies, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 218-36. Google Scholar

SCHARPF, F. W. (2008), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

SEARLE, G. (2018), ‘Conclusion’, in Searle (ed.), 173-87. Google Scholar

SHATKIN, G. (2016), ‘The real estate turn in policy and planning: land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia’, Cities, 53, 141-49. Google Scholar

SHOUP, D. (2008), ‘Graduated density zoning’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, 161-79. Google Scholar

SHUKLA, J. (2020), ‘Property institutions and their impact on land assembling strategies’, in P. Tiwari, G. Stillman and N. Yoshino (eds), Equitable Land Use for Asian Infrastructure, Tokyo, ADBI Press, 53-75. Google Scholar

SHULTZ, M. M. and SCHNIDMAN, F. (1990), ‘The potential application of land readjustment in the United States’, Urban Lawyer, 22, 197-243. Google Scholar

SLUYSMANS, J., VERBIST, S. and WARINGE, E. (eds) (2015), Expropriation Law in Europe, Deventer, Wolters Kluwer. Google Scholar

SMOLKA, M. O. (2013), Implementing Value Capture in Latin America, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Google Scholar

SORENSEN, A. (2000), ‘Conflict, consensus or consent: implications of Japanese land readjustment practice for developing countries’, Habitat International, 24, 51-73. Google Scholar

SORENSEN, A. (2007), ‘Consensus, persuasion and opposition: organizing land readjustment in Japan’, in Hong and Needham (eds), 89-114. Google Scholar

STEAD, D. (2012), ‘Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning’, Planning Practice & Research, 27, 103-16. Google Scholar

STEEL, G., VAN NOORLOOS, F. and KLAUFUS, C. (2017), ‘The urban land debate in the global South: new avenues for research’, Geoforum, 83, 133-41. Google Scholar

STOEBUCK, W. (1972), ‘A general theory of eminent domain’, Washington Law Review, 47, 553-608. Google Scholar

STOEBUCK, W. B. (1986), ‘Suburban land banking’, University of Illinois Law Review, 1986, 581-608. Google Scholar

STILLMAN, G. B. and BHARULE, S. (2020), ‘Governance institutions and key elements for the integrated planning and equitable deliverability of high-quality infrastructure’, in S. Hayashi, K. E. Seetha Ram and Y. Bharule (eds), Handbook on High-Speed Rail and Quality of Life, Tokyo, ADBI Press, 476-523. Google Scholar

SULLIVAN, E. (2018), ‘Eminent domain use for densification in the United States’, in Searle (ed.), 18-31. Google Scholar

SUN, J., CHEN, T., CHENG, Z., WANG, C. C. and NING, X. (2017), ‘A financing mode of urban rail transit based on land value capture: a case study in Wuhan City’, Transport Policy, 57, 59-67. Google Scholar

SUZUKI, H., JIN, M. and HONG, Y.-H. (2015), Financing Transit-Oriented Development with Land Values: Adapting Land Value Capture in Developing Countries, Washington, DC, World Bank Publications. Google Scholar

TEMEL, J. W. (2001), The Fundamentals of Municipal Bonds, New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc. Google Scholar

THIEL, F. (2008), Strategisches Landmanagement: Baulandentwicklung durch Recht, Ökonomie, Gemeinschaft und Information, Norderstadt, Books on Demand. Google Scholar

TURK, S. S. and ALTES, W. K. K. (2011), ‘Potential application of land readjustment method in urban renewal: analysis for Turkey’, ASCE Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137, 7-19. Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE (1996), Land Administration Guidelines, Geneva, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Google Scholar

VALTONEN, E., H. FALKENBACH and VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (2017), ‘Risk management in public land development projects: comparative case study in Finland and the Netherlands’, Land Use Policy, 62, 246-57. Google Scholar

VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and JACOBS, H. M. (2013), ‘Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: reflections on the Dutch experience’, Land Use Policy, 30, 774-83. Google Scholar

VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and LENFERINK, S. (2018), ‘The introduction of urban land readjustment legislation as an institutional innovation in Dutch land policy’, Habitat International, 76, 114-21. Google Scholar

VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and NEEDHAM, B. (2008), ‘Land readjustment for value capturing: a new planning tool for urban development’, Town Planning Review, 79, 485-506. Google Scholar

VAN DER KRABBEN, E., TIWARI, P. and SHUKLA, J. (2020), ‘Land use management strategies for equitable infrastructure and urban development: overview of strategies and tools’, in Tiwari et al. (eds), 14-49. Google Scholar

VAN DER VEEN, M., SPAANS, M. and JANSSEN-JANSEN, L. (2010), ‘Using compensation instruments as a vehicle to improve spatial planning: challenges and opportunities’, Land Use Policy, 27, 1010-17. Google Scholar

VIITANEN, K., PALMU, J., KASSO, M., HAKKARAINEN, E. and FALKENBACH, H. (2003), ‘Real estate in Finland’ (Publication B107 in real estate studies and economic law, Helsinki, Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Real Estate Studies, Espoo). Google Scholar

VON BRAUN, J. and MEINZAN-DICK, R. (2009), ‘“Land grabbing” by foreign investors in developing countries: risks and opportunities’ (IFPRI Policy Brief 13, April 2009). Google Scholar

WANG, J. D., SAMSURA, D. A. and VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (2019), ‘Institutional barriers to financing transit-oriented development in China: analyzing informal land value capture strategies’, Transport Policy, 82, 1-10. Google Scholar

WOESTENBURG, A., SPIT, T. and VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (2018), ‘Land policy discretion in times of economic downturn: how local authorities adapt to a new reality’, Land Use Policy, 77, 801-10. Google Scholar

WOESTENBURG, A., VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and SPIT, T. (2019), ‘Legitimacy dilemmas in direct government intervention: the case of public land development, an example from the Netherlands’, Land, 8, 110. Google Scholar

YOSHINO, N., PAUL, S., SARMA, V. and LAKHIA, S. (2018), ‘Land acquisition and infrastructure development through land trust laws: a policy framework for Asia’ (ADBI working paper series No. 854), Tokyo, Asian Development Bank Institute. Google Scholar

WORLD BANK (2020), ‘The right of preemption’, https://urban-regeneration.worldbank.org/node/35 (accessed 27 July 2020). Google Scholar

YOSHINO, N. and STILLMAN, G. B. (2017), ‘Kick-start private infrastructure with future tax-sharing bonds’, Reconnecting Asia, 26 May 2017. Google Scholar

ZEVENBERGEN, J., FERLAN, M. and MATTASSON, H. (2007), ‘Pre-emption rights compared’, in J. Zevenbergen, A. Frank and E. Stubkjaar (eds), Real Property Transactions: Procedures, Transaction Costs and Models, Amsterdam, IOS Press, 261-88. Google Scholar

ZUHUI, H. and HUI, W. (2002), ‘Land expropriation for a non-public purpose and compensation for its development right, Economic Research Journal, 5, 66-71. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

van der Krabben, Erwin

Tiwari, Piyush

Shukla, Jyoti