Town Planning Review

Something between 20 and 50 per cent: understanding heterogeneous implementation of added value capture in Switzerland

Town Planning Review Ahead of print, 1–24.

Abstract

When handling planning-related changes in land values, most planning systems are somewhat imbalanced. Whereas reduction of values (e.g. regulatory takings) are compensated fully, value increments remain to the landowners most often. Scholars and politicians have claimed to introduce an instrument to capture this added value to counterbalance this imbalance. Switzerland is one of the few countries that has actually introduced such an instrument in planning law. National legislators state that planning advantages are to be compensated at a rate of at least 20 per cent of planning-related advantages (Article 5 SPA). However, municipalities are granted discretion to shape the instrument, e.g. by defining a capture rate of 50 per cent. The present study aims to understand which contextual factors most influence municipalities to use the discretion granted. Based on a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of a representative set of thirty-three municipalities within the Canton of Bern, we examined five contextual factors (political, socio-economic, land managerial, administrative and financial) and their influence on the actual implementation of added-value capture. Our analysis shows that the professionalism of the local administration has the most substantial influence on the actual shape of the instrument’s implementation.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

ALTERMAN, R. (2010), Takings International, Chicago, ABA Press. Google Scholar

ALTERMAN, R. (2011), ‘Land-use regulations and property values’, in N. Brooks, K. Donaghy and G.-J. Knaap (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 755-86. Google Scholar

ALTERMAN, R. and KAYDEN, J. (1988), ‘Developer provisions of public benefits’, in R. Alterman (ed.), Private Supply of Public Services, New York, University Press, 22-32. Google Scholar

ASKEW, J. (2018), ‘A British perspective on added value capture’, in J.-D. Gerber, T. Hartmann and A. Hengstermann (eds), Instruments of Land Policy, London and New York, Routledge, 74-79. Google Scholar

AVELINE-DUBACH, N. and BLANDEAU, G. (2019), ‘The political economy of transit value capture’, Urban Studies, 56, 3415-31. Google Scholar

BEATLEY, T. (1988), ‘Development exactions and social justice’, in Alterman (ed.), 83-95. Google Scholar

BERNOULLI, H. (1946), Towns and the Land, Zurich, Verlag für Architektur. Google Scholar

BFS (BUNDESAMT FÜR STATISTIK (FEDERAL STATISTICAL OFFICE)) (2017), Raumgliederung der Schweiz, Neuchâtel, BfS Verlag. Google Scholar

BUNDESRAT (FEDERAL COUNCIL) (2010), ‘Botschaft zu einer Teilrevision des Raumplanungsgesetzes vom 20. Januar 2010’, BBl, 2009-762, 1049-84. Google Scholar

CHRISTENSEN, F. K. (2011) When Property Value Changes during Urban Development: Model and Factors, Aalborg, Aalborg University. Google Scholar

CRONQVIST, L. (2019), Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), Munich, Hampp. Google Scholar

DAVY, B. (2007), ‘Bodenpolitik in der leeren Stadt’, Flächenmanagement und Bodenordnung, 7, 56-65. Google Scholar

DUNNING, R., LORD, A., KESKIN, B. and BUCK, M. (2019), ‘Is there a relationship between planning culture and the value of planning gain?’, Town Planning Review, 90, 453-72. Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2016), European Semester Thematic Factsheet, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2017), Quality of Public Administration, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar

GLUMAC, B., HAN, Q. and SCHAEFER, W. (2018), ‘A negotiation decision model for public- private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment’, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45, 145-60. Google Scholar

GLUMAC, B., HERRERA-GOMEZ, M. and LICHERON, J. (2019), ‘A hedonic urban land price index’, Land Use Policy, 81, 802-12. Google Scholar

HAVEL, M. B. (2016), ‘Unlock the lock-in! Balance of rights in relation to betterment and compensation in Poland’, CLTS working papers (HH), 2/16. Google Scholar

HENDRICKS, A., KALBRO, T., LLORENTE, M., VILMIN, T. and WEITKAMP, A. (2017), ‘Public value capture of increasing property values’, in E. Hepperle, R. Dixon-Gough, R. Mansberger, J. Paulsson, J. Hernik and T. Kalbro (eds), Land Ownership and Land Use Development, Zurich, vdf Hochschulverlag, 257-81. Google Scholar

HENGSTERMANN, A. (2019), Von der passiven Bodennutzungsplanung zur aktiven Bodenpolitik, Wiesbaden, Springer. Google Scholar

HENGSTERMANN, A. and SCHEIWILLER, L. (2021), ‘Ausgleich Planungsbedingter Mehrwerte’, Umwelt- und Planungsrecht, 41, 85-91. Google Scholar

HUSTON, S. H. and LAHBASH, E. (2018), ‘Land value capture and tax increment financing’, European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2, 1-9. Google Scholar

JÜRGENSON, E., AUZINŞ̌, A. and BURINSKIENĖ, M. (2017), ‘Land value capture to promote local development in Baltics’, 10th International Conference on Environmental Engineering, ICEE 2017, 27-28. Google Scholar

KAISER, N., RUDOLF, S., BERLI, J., HERSPERGER, A., KIENAST, F. and SCHULZ, T. (2016), ‘Raumplanung in den Schweizer Gemeinden’, WSL Berichte, 42, 110. Google Scholar

KNIELING, J. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (2015), ‘Planning culture’, European Planning Studies, 23, 2133-47. Google Scholar

LAMBELET, S. and VIALLON, F.-X. (2019), ‘The influence of politicisation on the implementation of developer obligations in a federalist country’, in Muñoz-Gielen and van der Krabben (eds), 100-10. Google Scholar

LICHFIELD, N. and CONNELLAN, C. (2000), Land Value Taxation for the Benefit of the Community, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Google Scholar

LORD, A., CHEANG, C.-W. and DUNNING, R. (2021) ‘Understanding the geography of affordable housing provided through land value capture’, Urban Studies Online, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0042098021998893 (accessed 21 September 2021). Google Scholar

LORD, A., DUNNING, R., BURGESS, G., CARRO, A., CROOK, T., WATKINS, C. and WHITEHEAD, C. (2018), The Incidence, Value and Delivery of Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy in England in 2016-17, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, London, HMSO. Google Scholar

McALLISTER, P. (2019), ‘The taxing problems of land value capture’, Town Planning Review, 90, 429-51. Google Scholar

McALLISTER, P., SHEPHERD, E. and WYATT, P. (2018), ‘Policy shifts, developer contributions and land value capture in London 2005-2017’, Land Use Policy, 78, 316-26. Google Scholar

MARX, A. and DUSA, A. (2011), ‘Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification’, Methodological Innovations Online, 6, 103-48. Google Scholar

MILL, J. S. (1848), Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, London, Parker. Google Scholar

MUÑOZ-GIELEN, D. (2014), ‘Urban governance, property rights, land readjustment and public value capturing’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 21, 60-78. Google Scholar

MUÑOZ-GIELEN, D. and BURON-CUADRADO, J. (2015), Land Policies for Public Value Capture across Europe, LANDac, 9-10. Google Scholar

MUÑOZ-GIELEN, D. and TASAN-KOK, T. (2010), ‘Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public-value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands’, European Planning Studies, 18, 1097-131. Google Scholar

MUÑOZ-GIELEN, D. and VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (2019), Public Infrastructure, Private Finance: Developer Obligations and Responsibilities, London, Routledge. Google Scholar

NAHRATH, S. (2003), La mise en place du régime institutionnel de l’aménagement du territoire en Suisse entre 1960 et 1990, Lausanne, Université de Lausanne. Google Scholar

NAHRATH, S. and VIALLON, F.-X. (2016), ‘La taxe sur la plus-value: l’outil manquant de l’aménagement du territoire?’, Collage, 3, 5-9. Google Scholar

OECD (ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT) (2015), Regulatory Policy Outlook 2015, Paris, OECD Publishing. Google Scholar

OECD (ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT) (2017), The Governance of Land Use in OECD Countries, Paris, OECD Publishing. Google Scholar

OPPIO, A., TORRIERI, F. and BIANCONI, M. (2019), ‘Land value capture by urban development agreements’, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 100, 346-53. Google Scholar

PAGE, S. E. (2006), ‘Path dependence’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 87-115. Google Scholar

RAGIN, C. (1987), The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Methods, Berkeley, University of California Press. Google Scholar

RAGIN, C. (2000), Fuzzy-Set Social Science, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

RAGIN, C. (2008), Redesigning Social Inquiry, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

RAGIN, C. and RIHOUX, B. (eds) (2009), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Thousand Oaks, Sage. Google Scholar

REBELO, E. M. (2017), ‘Land betterment capture revisited’, Land Use Policy, 69, 392-407. Google Scholar

RIHOUX, B. (2017), ‘Configurational comparative methods (QCA and fuzzy sets)’, in J. Woldendorp and H. Keman (eds), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 383-99. Google Scholar

RIHOUX, B. and RAGIN, C. C. (2009), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Los Angeles, Sage Publications. Google Scholar

RIVA, E. (2007), Wohlerworbene Rechte - Eigentum - Vertrauen: dogmatische Grundlagen und Anwendung auf die Restwassersanierungen nach Art. 80 des eidgenössischen Gewässerschutzgesetzes, Bern, Stämpfli. Google Scholar

RIVA, E. (2016), ‘Art. 5 Ausgleich und Entschädigung’, in H. Aemisegger, P. Moor, A. Ruch and P. Tschannen (eds), Praxis-Kommentar RPG: Nutzungsplanung, Zurich, Schulthess, 63-78. Google Scholar

SCHNEIDER, A. (2006), Der angemessene Ausgleich für erhebliche Planungsvorteile nach Art. 5 Abs. 1 RPG, Zurich, Schulthess. Google Scholar

SCHNEIDER, C. and WAGEMANN, C. (2010), ‘Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets’, Comparative Sociology, 9, 397-418. Google Scholar

SCOTT, E. P. (2006), ‘Path dependence’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 87-115. Google Scholar

SHAHAB, S. and VIALLON F.-X. (2019) ‘A transaction-cost analysis of Swiss land improvement syndicates’, Town Planning Review, 90, 545-66. Google Scholar

SHAHAB, S. and VIALLON F.-X. (2020), ‘Swiss land improvement syndicates: impure Coasian solutions?’, Planning Theory, 20, 44-62. Google Scholar

SMOLKA, M. O. (2013), Implementing Value Capture in Latin America: Policies and Tools for Urban Development, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Google Scholar

VALTONEN, E., FALKENBACH, H. and VIITANEN, K. (2018), ‘Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development’, Land Use Policy, 78, 481-92. Google Scholar

VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and NEEDHAM, B. (2008), ‘Land readjustment for value capturing’, Town Planning Review, 79, 651-72. Google Scholar

VAN DER VEEN, M., SPAANS, M. and JANSSEN-JANSEN, L. (2010), ‘Using compensation instruments as a vehicle to improve spatial planning, Land Use Policy, 27, 1010-17. Google Scholar

VARGO, S. L., MAGLIO, P. P. and AKAKA, M. A. (2008), ‘On value and value co-creation’, European Management Journal, 26, 145-52. Google Scholar

VIALLON, F.-X. (2017), Redistributive Instruments in Swiss Land Use Policy, Lausanne, Université de Lausanne. Google Scholar

VIALLON, F.-X. and NAHRATH, S. (2016), ‘La taxe sur la plus-value: l’outil manquant de l’aménagement du territoire?’, Collage, 3, 5-9. Google Scholar

WALRAS, L. (1860), L’économie politique et la justice, Paris, Guillaumin. Google Scholar

WOESTENBURG, A. K., VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and SPIT, T. (2019), ‘Land policy discretion in times of economic downturn: how local authorities adapt to a new reality’, Land Use Policy, 77, 801-10. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Hengstermann, Andreas

Viallon, François-Xavier